The detailed design of the inducer of a high pressure ratio transonic radial compressor impeller with a design inlet tip relative Mach number of 1.4 is considered. Numerical analysis has been used to compare a datum impeller with ruled inducer design with a number of different free-form design concepts, generated following the same aerodynamic design philosophy. The datum stage and one with a free-form inducer, referred to as “barrelled forward swept,” with forward swept leading edge near the tip and increased chord at midspan, have been manufactured and tested. The tests were performed with the same stationary components, including the casing, vaned diffuser, and the volute. The design with a barrelled forward sweep of the inducer allows the designer more control of the strength and position of the passage shock at the inlet while meeting mechanical constraints. Interestingly, the performance is also enhanced at off-design points at lower tip-speeds. The measurements show that the stage tested with the swept impeller achieves higher efficiency of between 0.5% and 1.6% compared to the datum design, depending on the operating speed. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are used to further study the flow at part speeds, in order to explain the causes of the observed performance differences at off design conditions.

References

1.
Casey
,
M. V.
,
1983
, “
A Computational Geometry for the Blades and Internal Flow Channels of Centrifugal Compressors
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
105
(
2
), pp.
288
295
.
2.
Hazby
,
H.
,
Casey
,
M. V.
,
Numakura
,
R.
, and
Tamaki
,
H.
,
2014
, “
A Transonic Mixed Flow Compressor for an Extreme Duty
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(5), p. 051010.
3.
Elfert
,
M.
,
Weber
,
A.
,
Wittrock
,
D.
,
Peters
,
A.
,
Voss
,
C.
, and
Nicke
,
E.
,
2016
, “Experimental and Numerical Verification of an Optimization of a Fast Rotating High Performance Radial Compressor Impeller,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56546.
4.
ANSYS
,
2013
, “
ANSYS manual
, Version 17.1,” ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
5.
Came
,
P. M.
, and
Robinson
,
C. J.
,
1998
, “
Centrifugal Compressor Design
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C
,
213
(2), pp. 139–156.
6.
Lohmberg
,
A.
,
Casey
,
M. V.
, and
Ammann
,
S.
,
2003
, “
Transonic Radial Compressor Inlet Design
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
,
217
(
4
), pp.
367
374
.
7.
Freeman
,
C.
, and
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
,
1992
, “
A Method for the Prediction of Supersonic Compressor Blade Performance
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
8
(
1
), pp.
199
208
.
8.
Calvert
,
J.
, and
Ginder
,
R. B.
,
1999
, “
Transonic Fan and Compressor Design
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C
,
213
(
5
), pp.
419
436
.
9.
Hazby
,
H.
, and
Xu
,
L.
,
2009
, “
Numerical Investigation of the Effects of the Leading Edge Sweep in a Small Transonic Impeller
,”
Eigth European Turbomahinery Conference
(
ETC
), Graz, Austria, Mar. 23–27, pp. 459–467.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289577068_Numerical_investigation_of_the_effects_of_leading_Edge_sweep_in_a_small_transonic_impeller
10.
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Xu
,
L.
,
1998
, “
The Exploitation of the Three-Dimensional Flow in Turbomachinery Design
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C
,
213
(2), pp. 125–137.
11.
Hah
,
C.
,
Puterbaugh
,
S. L.
, and
Waidia
,
A. R.
,
1998
, “Control of Shock Structure and Secondary Flow Field Inside Transonic Compressor Rotors Through Aerodynamic Sweep,”
ASME
Paper No. 98-GT-561.
12.
Rowlands
,
P. A.
,
2000
, “Swept Fan Blade,” Rolls-Royce Plc, Westhampnett, UK, U.S. Patent No.
US6071077 A
.https://www.google.co.in/patents/US6071077?dq=%E2%80%9CSwept+Fan+Blade,%E2%80%9D&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjmtrC6sPfWAhUV84MKHVSxBZUQ6AEIJTAA
13.
Hazby
,
H.
, and
Xu
,
L.
,
2009
, “Role of Tip Leakage in Stall of a Transonic Centrifugal Impeller,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-59372.
14.
Spakovszky
,
Z. S.
, and
Roduner
,
C. H.
,
2009
, “
Spike and Modal Stall Inception in an Advanced Turbocharger Centrifugal Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
131
(
3
), p.
031012
.
You do not currently have access to this content.