The demand of increasing pressure ratios for modern high pressure compressors leads to decreasing blade heights in the last stages. As tip clearances (TC) cannot be reduced to any amount and minimum values might be necessary for safety reasons, the TC ratios of the last stages can reach values notably higher than current norms. This can be intensified by a compressor running in transient operations where thermal differences can lead to further growing clearances. For decades, the detrimental effects of large clearances on an axial compressor's operating range and efficiency are known and investigated. The ability of circumferential casing grooves in the rotor casing to improve the compressor's operating range has also been in the focus of research for many years. Their simplicity and ease of installation are one reason for their continuing popularity nowadays, where advanced methods to increase the operating range of an axial compressor are known. In the authors' previous paper, three different circumferential groove casing treatments were investigated in a single-stage environment in the low-speed axial research compressor at TU Dresden. One of these grooves was able to notably improve the operating range and the efficiency of the single stage compressor at very large rotor TC (5% of chord length). In this paper, the results of tests with this particular groove type in a three stage environment in the low-speed axial research compressor are presented. Two different rotor TC sizes of 1.2% and 5% of tip chord length were investigated. At the small TC, the grooves are almost neutral. Only small reductions in total pressure ratio and efficiency compared to the solid wall can be observed. If the compressor runs with large TC, it notably benefits from the casing grooves. Both, total pressure and efficiency can be improved by the grooves in a similar extent as in single stage tests. Five-hole probe measurements and unsteady wall pressure measurements show the influence of the groove on the flow field. With the help of numerical investigations, the different behavior of the grooves at the two TC sizes will be discussed.

References

1.
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
1985
, “
Loss Reduction in Axial-Flow Compressors Through Low-Speed Model Testing
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
(
2
), pp.
354
363
.
2.
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
,
2004
,
Compressor Aerodynamics
,
Krieger Publishing
,
Malabar, FL
.
3.
Osborn
,
W. M.
,
Lewis
,
G. W.
, and
Heidelberg
,
L. J.
,
1971
, “
Effect of Several Porous Casing Treatments on Stall Limit and on Overall Performance of an Axial Flow Compressor Rotor
,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Technical Report No.
NASA-TN-D-6537
.
4.
Prince
,
D.
,
Wisler
,
D.
, and
Hilvers
,
D.
,
1974
, “
Study of Casing Treatment Stall Margin Improvement Phenomena
,” NASA, Washington, DC, Technical Report No.
CR 134552
.
5.
Takata
,
H.
, and
Tsukuda
,
Y.
,
1977
, “
Stall Margin Improvement by Casing Treatment—Its Mechanism and Effectiveness
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
99
(
1
), pp.
121
133
.
6.
Fujita
,
H.
, and
Takata
,
H.
,
1984
, “
A Study of Configurations of Casing Treatment for Axial Flow Compressors
,”
Bull. JSME
,
27
(
230
), pp.
1675
1681
.
7.
Shabbir
,
A.
, and
Adamczyk
,
J.
,
2005
, “
Flow Mechanism for Stall Margin Improvement Due to Circumferential Casing Grooves on Axial Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
127
(
4
), pp.
708
717
.
8.
Lu
,
X.
,
Chu
,
W.
,
Zhu
,
J.
, and
Wu
,
Y.
,
2006
, “
Mechanism of the Interaction Between Casing Treatment and Tip Leakage Flow in a Subsonic Axial Compressor
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90077.
9.
Perrot
,
V.
,
Touyeras
,
A.
, and
Lucien
,
G.
,
2007
, “
Detailed CFD Analysis of a Grooved Casing Treatment on an Axial Subsonic Compressor
,”
Seventh European Turbomachinery Conference
, Athens, Greece, Mar., Paper No. ETC7-016.
10.
Rolfes
,
M.
,
Lange
,
M.
, and
Vogeler
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Experimental Investigation of Circumferential Groove Casing Treatments for Large Tip Clearances in a Low Speed Axial Research Compressor
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-42646.
11.
Houghton
,
T.
, and
Day
,
I.
,
2011
, “
Enhancing the Stability of Subsonic Compressors Using Casing Grooves
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
2
), p.
021007
.
12.
Li
,
J.
,
Feng
,
L.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Du
,
J.
,
Nie
,
C.
, and
Chen
,
J.
,
2014
, “
Extensive Experimental Study of Circumferential Single Groove in an Axial Flow Compressor
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-26859.
13.
Boos
,
P.
,
Möckel
,
H.
,
Henne
,
J.
, and
Selmeier
,
R.
,
1998
, “
Flow Measurement in a Multistage Large Scale Low Speed Axial Flow Research Compressor
,”
ASME
Paper No. 98-GT-432.
14.
Künzelmann
,
M.
,
Müller
,
R.
,
Mailach
,
R.
, and
Vogeler
,
K.
,
2008
, “
Steady and Unsteady Flow Field in a Multistage Low-Speed Axial Compressor—A Test Case
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-50793.
15.
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
, and
Horlock
,
J. H.
,
2006
, “
Averaging Nonuniform Flow for a Purpose
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
128
(
1
), pp.
120
129
.
16.
VanZante
,
D. E.
,
Strazisar
,
A. J.
,
Wood
,
J. R.
,
Hathaway
,
M. D.
, and
Okiishi
,
T. H.
,
2000
, “
Recommendations for Achieving Accurate Numerical Simulation of Tip Clearance Flows in Transonic Compressor Rotors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
(
4
), pp.
733
742
.
17.
Cevik
,
M.
,
Vo
,
H. D.
, and
Yu
,
H.
,
2016
, “
Casing Treatment for Desensitization of Compressor Performance and Stability to Tip Clearance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
12
), p.
121008
.
18.
Juan
,
D.
,
Jichao
,
L.
,
Lipeng
,
G.
,
Feng
,
L.
, and
Jingyi
,
C.
,
2016
, “
The Impact of Casing Grooves Location on Stall Margin and Tip Clearance Flow in a Low-Speed Axial Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
12
), p.
121007
.
19.
Hah
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Effects of Double-Leakage Tip Clearance Flow on the Performance of a Compressor Stage With a Large Rotor Tip Gap
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
139
(
6
), p.
061006
.
You do not currently have access to this content.