Boundary layer measurements have been made on the concave surfaces of two constant curvature blades using hot wire anemometry. All the current experiments were performed with negligible streamwise pressure gradient. Grids were used to produce a range of freestream turbulence levels between 1% and 4%. The freestream velocity increases with distance from a concave wall according to the free vortex condition making the determination of the boundary layer edge difficult. A flat plate equivalent boundary layer procedure was adopted, therefore, to overcome this problem. The Taylor–Goertler (TG) vortices resulting from the concave curvature were found to make the laminar and turbulent boundary layer profiles fuller and to increase the skin friction coeffiicent by up to 40% compared with flat plate values. This leads to a more rapid growth in boundary layer thickness. The evolution in the intermittency through transition is very similar to that for a flat plate, however, the shape factors are depressed slightly throughout the flow due to the fuller velocity profiles. For all the current experiments, curvature promoted transition. This was very marked at low freestream turbulence level but remained significant even at the highest levels. It appears that the velocity fluctuations associated with the TG vortices enhance the freestream turbulence resulting in a higher effective turbulence level. A new empirical correlation for start of transition based on this premise is presented. The ratio of end to start of transition momentum thickness Reynolds numbers was found to be approximately constant.

1.
Abu-Ghannam
,
B. J.
, and
Shaw
,
R.
, 1980, “
Natural Transition of Boundary Layers—The effects of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient and Flow History
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0022-2542,
22
, p.
213
.
2.
Johnson
,
M. W.
, and
Ercan
,
A. H.
, 1999, “
A Physical model for Bypass Transition
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
0142-727X,
20
, p.
95
.
3.
Solomon
,
W. J.
,
Walker
,
G. J.
, and
Gostelow
,
J. P.
, 1995, “
Transition length prediction for flows with rapidly changing pressure gradients
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
118
, p.
185
.
4.
Vicedo
,
J.
,
Vilmin
,
S.
,
Dawes
,
W. N.
, and
Savill
,
A. M.
, 2003, “
Intermittency Transport Modeling of Separated Flow Transition
,” ASME paper GT-2003-38719.
5.
Redford
,
J. A.
, and
Johnson
,
M. W.
, “
Predicting transitional separation bubbles
,” ASME paper GT-2004-53353.
6.
Kim
,
J.
, and
Simon
,
T. W.
, 2004, “
Free-stream turbulence and concave curvature effects on heated transitional boundary layers
,”
1
, final report, NASA CR 187150.
7.
Kim
,
J.
,
Simon
,
T. W.
, and
Russ
,
S. G.
, 1992, “
Free-stream turbulence and concave curvature effects on heated transitional boundary layers
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
0022-1481,
114
, p.
338
.
8.
Schultz
,
M. P.
, and
Volino
,
R. J.
, 2001, “
Effects of concave curvature on boundary layer transition under high free-stream turbulence conditions
,” ASME paper GT-2001-0191.
9.
Riley
,
S.
,
Johnson
,
M. W.
, and
Gibbings
,
J. C.
, 1989, “
Boundary layer transition on strongly concave surfaces
,” ASME paper 89-GT-321.
10.
Fasihfar
,
A.
, and
Johnson
,
M. W.
, 1992, “
An improved boundary layer transition correlation
,” ASME paper 92-GT-245.
11.
Hachem
,
F.
, 2003, “
Boundary layer transition on concave surfaces
,” PhD thesis, Dept. of Engineering, University of Liverpool.
12.
Dris
,
A.
, 1957, “
Boundary layer transition on a flat plate and concave surfaces
,” PhD thesis, Dept. of Engineering, University of Liverpool.
13.
Narasimha
,
R.
, 2003, “
On the distribution of intermittency in the transition region of a boundary layer
,”
J. Aeronaut. Sci.
0095-9812,
24
, p.
711
.
14.
Gostelow
,
J. P.
, and
Walker
,
G. J.
, 1991, “
Similarity behaviour in transitional boundary layers over a range of adverse pressure gradients and turbulence levels
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
113
, p.
617
.
15.
Volino
,
R. J.
, and
Simon
,
T. W.
, 1997, “
Measurements in a transitional boundary layer with Görtler vortices
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
, p.
562
.
16.
Hachem
,
F.
, and
Johnson
,
M. W.
, 1990, “
A boundary layer transition correla-tion for concave surfaces
,” ASME paper 90-GT-222.
17.
Klebanoff
,
P. S.
, 1954, “
Characteristics of turbulence in boundary layers with zero pressure gradient
,” National Bureau of Standards, NACA TN No. 3178.
18.
Johnson
,
M. W.
, and
Ercan
,
A. H.
, “
Predicting Bypass Transition: A Physical Model versus Empirical Correlations
,” Proc. ASME paper 97-GT-475.
19.
Liepmann
,
H. W.
, 1943, “
Investigations on laminar boundary-layer stability and transition on curved boundaries
,” NACA Wartime Report W-107.
20.
Tani
,
I.
, and
Aihara
,
Y.
, 1969, “
Görtler vortices and boundary layer transition
,”
Z. Angew. Math. Phys.
0044-2275,
20
, p.
609
.
21.
Mayle
,
R. E.
, “
The role of laminar–turbulent transition in gas turbine engines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
113
, p.
509
.
You do not currently have access to this content.