Turbine blades experience significant surface degradation with service. Previous studies indicate that an order-of-magnitude or greater increase in roughness height is typical, and these elevated levels of surface roughness significantly influence turbine efficiency and heat transfer. This paper presents measurement and a mean-line analysis of turbine efficiency reduction due to blade surface roughness. Performance tests have been conducted in a low-speed, single-stage, axial flow turbine with roughened blades. Sheets of sandpaper with equivalent sandgrain roughnesses of 106 and 400 μm have been used to roughen the blades. The roughness heights correspond to foreign deposits on real turbine blades measured by Bons et al. [1]. In the transitionally rough regime (106 μm), normalized efficiency decreases by approximately 4% with either roughened stator or roughened rotor and by 8% with roughness on both the stator and rotor blades. In the fully rough regime (400 μm), normalized efficiency decreases by 2% with roughness on the pressure side and by 6% with roughness on the suction side. Also, the normalized efficiency decreases by 11% with roughness only on stator vanes, 8% with roughness only on rotor blades, and 19% with roughness on both the stator and rotor blades.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
surface roughness, confined flow, rotors, stators, turbines, heat transfer, machine testing, boundary layers
Topics:
Blades, Pressure, Rotors, Stators, Surface roughness, Turbines, Flow (Dynamics), Suction
1.
Bons
,
J. P.
,
Taylor
,
R. P.
,
McClain
,
S. T.
, and
Rivir
,
R. B.
,
2001
, “
The Many Faces of Turbine Surface Roughness
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
123
(
4
), pp.
739
–
748
.
2.
Taylor
,
R. P.
,
1990
, “
Surface Roughness Measurements on Gas Turbine Blades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
112
(
2
), pp.
175
–
180
.
3.
Bogard
,
D. G.
,
Schmidt
,
D. L.
, and
Tabbita
,
M.
,
1998
, “
Characterization and Laboratory Simulation of Turbine Airfoil Surface Roughness and Associated Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
(
2
), pp.
337
–
342
.
4.
Sigal
,
A.
, and
Danberg
,
J. E.
,
1990
, “
New Correlation of Roughness Density Effect on the Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
AIAA J.
,
28
(
3
), pp.
554
–
556
.
5.
Bons
,
J. P.
,
2002
, “
St and cf Augmentation for Real Turbine Roughness with Elevated Freestream Turbulence
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
(
4
), pp.
632
–
644
.
6.
Schlichting, H., 1979, Boundary Layer Theory, seventh Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
7.
Bammert
,
K.
, and
Sandstede
,
H.
,
1972
, “
Measurements Concerning the Influence of Surface Roughness and Profile Changes on the Performance of Gas Turbine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
94
(
3
), pp.
207
–
213
.
8.
Bammert
,
K.
, and
Sandstede
,
H.
,
1980
, “
Measurements of the Boundary Layer Development Along a Turbine Blade With Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
102
(
4
), pp.
978
–
983
.
9.
Kind
,
R. J.
,
Serjak
,
P. J.
, and
Abbott
,
M. W. P.
,
1998
, “
Measurements and Prediction of the Effects of Surface Roughness on Profile Losses and Deviation in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
(
1
), pp.
20
–
27
.
10.
Boyle, R.J., and Senyitko, R.G., 2003, “Measurements and Predictions of Surface Roughness Effects on Turbine Vane Aerodynamics,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38580.
11.
Boynton
,
J. L.
,
Tabibzadeh
,
R.
, and
Hudson
,
S. T.
,
1993
, “
Investigation of Rotor Blade Roughness Effects on Turbine Performance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
(
3
), pp.
614
–
620
.
12.
Abuaf
,
N.
,
Bunker
,
R. S.
, and
Lee
,
C. P.
,
1998
, “
Effects of Surface Roughness on Heat Transfer and Aerodynamic Performance of Turbine Airfoils
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
(
3
), pp.
522
–
529
.
13.
Nikuradse, J., 1933, “Laws for Flows in Rough Pipes,” VDI-Forschungsheft, 361(B4).
14.
Kline
,
S. J.
, and
McClintock
,
F. A.
,
1953
“
Describing Uncertainty in Single Sample Experiments
,”
Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
,
January
pp.
3
–
8
.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.