A theoretical evaluation was conducted delineating how aeromechanical feedback control can be utilized to stabilize the inception of rotating stall in axial compressors. Ten aeromechanical control methodologies were quantitatively examined based on the analytical formulations presented in the first part of this paper. The maximum operating range for each scheme is determined for optimized structural parameters, and the various schemes are compared. The present study shows that the most promising aeromechanical designs and controls for a class of low-speed axial compressors were the use of dynamic fluid injection. Aeromechanically incorporating variable duct geometries and dynamically re-staggered IGV and rotor blades were predicted to yield less controllability. The aeromechanical interaction of a flexible casing wall was predicted to be destabilizing, and thus should be avoided by designing sufficiently rigid structures to prevent casing ovalization or other structurally induced variations in tip clearance. Control authority, a metric developed in the first part of this paper, provided a useful interpretation of the aeromechanical damping of the coupled system. The model predictions also show that higher spatial modes can become limiting with aeromechanical feedback, both in control of rotating stall as well as in considering the effects of lighter, less rigid structural aeroengine designs on compressor stability.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2004
Technical Papers
Tailored Structural Design and Aeromechanical Control of Axial Compressor Stall—Part II: Evaluation of Approaches
L. G. Fre´chette,
L. G. Fre´chette
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
Search for other works by this author on:
O. G. McGee,
O. G. McGee
Department of Civil, Environmental Engineering, and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
Search for other works by this author on:
M. B. Graf
M. B. Graf
Mars and Company, 124 Mason Street, Greenwich, CT 06830
Search for other works by this author on:
L. G. Fre´chette
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
O. G. McGee
Department of Civil, Environmental Engineering, and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
M. B. Graf
Mars and Company, 124 Mason Street, Greenwich, CT 06830
Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute and presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Atlanta, GA, June 16–19, 2003. Manuscript received by the IGTI December 2002; final revision March 2003. Paper No. 2003-GT-38976. Review Chair: H. R. Simmons.
J. Turbomach. Jan 2004, 126(1): 63-72 (10 pages)
Published Online: March 26, 2004
Article history
Received:
December 1, 2002
Revised:
March 1, 2003
Online:
March 26, 2004
Citation
Fre´chette, L. G., McGee, O. G., and Graf, M. B. (March 26, 2004). "Tailored Structural Design and Aeromechanical Control of Axial Compressor Stall—Part II: Evaluation of Approaches ." ASME. J. Turbomach. January 2004; 126(1): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1644556
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Guideline for Large-Scale Analysis of Centrifugal Blower Using Wall-Resolved Large Eddy Simulation
J. Turbomach (February 2025)
Related Articles
Tailored Structural Design and Aeromechanical Control of Axial Compressor Stall—Part I: Development of Models and Metrics
J. Turbomach (January,2004)
1997 Best Paper Award—Controls and Diagnostics Committee: Active Stabilization of Rotating Stall and Surge in a Transonic Single-Stage Axial Compressor
J. Turbomach (October,1998)
Blade Tip Clearance Flow and Compressor Nonsynchronous Vibrations: The Jet Core Feedback Theory as the Coupling Mechanism
J. Turbomach (January,2009)
Multibladerow Forced Response Modeling in Axial-Flow Core Compressors
J. Turbomach (April,2007)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
QP Based Encoder Feedback Control
Robot Manipulator Redundancy Resolution
Norms of Feedback Systems
Robust Control: Youla Parameterization Approach
Station Automation
Pipeline System Automation and Control