In both power generation plants and the chemical industries, there is a need to assess the significance of defects which may exist in high-temperature equipment operating in the creep range. This paper examines the methods of analysis used in laboratory creep crack growth data and their relevance to crack growth data derived from feature component tests which best simulate actual components under controlled testing condition. The material examined was a 214 Cr 1 Mo steel in the new condition at 550 and 600°C. The creep crack growth properties were determined on compact tension specimens. The data were compared with representative crack growth data from feature test components. These consisted of cracked rings, thick-walled cylinders, and thin-walled tubes containing axial or circumferential defects under combinations of axial and internal pressure loading. Little influence of size or temperature on the measured crack propagation rates was observed when the results were plotted against the creep fracture mechanics parameter C*. This is shown to be because the relevant condition had little effect on the appropriate crack tip creep ductilities of the material. Good correspondence was observed between the compact tension and the feature component tests, suggesting the feasibility of the C* method for predicting short-term laboratory tests using different geometries. [S0094-9930(00)01001-5]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
fracture mechanics, cracks, alloy steel, high-temperature effects, creep testing, failure (mechanical), mechanical testing
Topics:
Creep, Fracture (Materials), Fracture mechanics, Steel
1.
Hurst, R. C., Church, J. M., Looney, L., and Mcallister, S., 1993, “Creep Crack Growth Behaviour of Tubular Steel Components Containing Internal or External Defects,” Proc. of the Fifth Int. Conf. on Creep and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, eds., B. Wilshire and R. W. Evans, The Inst. of Materials, London, pp. 437–447.
2.
Nikbin
,
K. M.
,
Smith
,
D. J.
, and
Webster
,
G. A.
,
1986
, “
Prediction of Creep Crack Growth From Uni-Axial Creep Data
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
396
, pp.
183
–
193
.
3.
Nikbin
,
K. M.
,
Smith
,
D. J.
, and
Webster
,
G. A.
,
1986
, “
An Engineering Approach to the Prediction of Creep Crack Growth
,”
ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
,
108
, pp.
186
–
191
.
4.
Webster
,
G. A.
,
1992
, “
Lifetime Estimates of Cracked High Temperature Components
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
50
, pp.
133
–
145
.
5.
Ainsworth, R. A., 1989, “Approximate Non-Linear Fracture Mechanics Calculations using Reference Stress Techniques, Innovative Approaches to Irradiation Damage and Fracture Analysis,” Proc. Joint ASME/JSME PVP Conf., Honolulu, Hawaii, ASME PVP, 170, July 23–27, pp. 13–20.
6.
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
,
1968
, “
Singular Behaviour at The End of a Tensile Crack in a Hardening Material
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
16
, pp.
13
–
31
.
7.
ASTM E 1457-98, 1998, “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Creep Crack Growth Rates in Metals,” ASTM Standards 03.01, pp. 1031–1043.
8.
Ainsworth
,
R. A.
,
Chell
,
G. G.
,
Coleman
,
M. C.
,
Goodall
,
I. W.
,
Gooch
,
D. J.
,
Haigh
,
J. R.
,
Kimmins
,
S. T.
, and
Neate
,
G. J.
,
1987
, “
CEGB Assessment Procedure for Defects in Plant Operating in the Creep Range
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
,
10
, pp.
115
–
127
.
9.
Kumar, V., German, M. D. and Shih, C. F., 1981, “An Engineering Approach for Elastic-Plastic Fracture,” EPRI Report NP 1931.
10.
Miller
,
A. G.
,
1988
, “
Review of Limit Loads for Structures Containing Defects
,”
Int. J. Pres. Vessels Piping
,
32
, pp.
197
–
327
.
11.
BSPD 6439, 1991, “Guidance on Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Components and Relation to Microscopic Material Properties,” British Standards Inst., London, UK.
12.
Rooke, D. P., and Cartwright, D. J., 1976, “Compendium of Stress Intensity Factors,” HMSO, London, UK.
13.
Tada, H., Paris, P. C., and Irwin, G. R., 1985, Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Del Research, Hellertown, PA.
14.
Djavanroodi, F., and Webster, G. A., 1992, “Comparisons Between Numerical and Experimental Estimates of The Creep Fracture Mechanics Parameter C*,” Fracture Mechanics, eds., H. A. Ernst, A. Saxena, and D. L. McDowell, ASTM STP 1131, 1, pp. 271–283.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.