Abstract

Feedback reactivity caused by core deformation is one of the inherent safety features in a sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR). To validate the evaluation models of the reactivity feedback equipped in the in-house plant dynamics analysis code, named Super-COPD, we have been conducting the benchmark analyses for the unprotected loss of heat sink (ULOHS) tests of balance of plant (BOP)-302R and BOP-301 as one of the representative issues in Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II), a pool-type experimental SFR in the United States. During the transient of the ULOHS tests, the reactor power decreased to the decay heat level due to the negative reactivity caused by the radial expansion of the core. Developing the evaluation models of the reactivity feedback is essential for predicting the plant behavior in unprotected events, such as ULOHS events, and the numerical analyses modeling the feedback reactivity were conducted. By comparing the numerical results and the experimental data, the increment temperature profiles of the core inlet and the decreasing reactor power profile calculated by Super-COPD were comparable with experimental data. The applicability of the evaluation models for the reactivity feedback was indicated during the ULOHS event. In addition, through the sensitivity analyses on the cold pool model, it was found that the modification of the plenum model of the cold pool to take into account the thermal stratification was required to improve the core inlet temperature profile.

References

1.
Otaki
,
A.
, and
Ohira
,
H.
,
1990
, “
Special Issue About the Development of Software for Computers
,” Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, Report No.76, PNC TN1340 90-004, pp.
27
36
(in Japanese).
2.
Doda
,
N.
,
Ohira
,
H.
, and
Kamide
,
H.
,
2016
, “
Benchmark Analysis of EBR-II Shutdown Heat Removal Test-17 Using of Plant Dynamics Analysis Code and Subchannel Analysis Code
,”
Proc. of International Conference of Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP)
, San Francisco, CA, Apr. 17–20, pp.
1618
1625
.
3.
Nabeshima
,
K.
,
Doda
,
N.
, and
Ohshima
,
H.
,
2015
, “
Analysis of Natural Circulation Tests in the Experimental Fast Reactor Joyo
,”
Proc. of International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics
, Chicago, IL, Aug. 30–Sept. 4, pp.
1041
1049
.
4.
Yamada
,
F.
, and
Ohira
,
H.
,
2010
, “
Numerical Simulation of MONJU Plant Dynamics by Super-COPD Using Previous Startup Tests Data
,”
Proc. of 3rd Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting and 8th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels and Minichannels
, Montreal, Canada, Aug. 1-5, pp. 1951-1958.
5.
Yamada
,
F.
,
Fukano
,
Y.
,
Nishi
,
H.
, and
Konomura
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Development of Natural Circulation Analytical Model in SUPER-COPD Code and Evaluation of Core Cooling Capability in Monju During a Station Blackout
,”
Nucl. Technol.
,
188
(
3
), pp.
292
321
.10.13182/NT13-56
6.
Sumner
,
T.
,
Zhang
,
G.
, and
Fanning
,
H. T.
,
2018
, “
BOP-301 and BOP-302R: Test Definitions and Analyses
,” Argonne National Laboratory, Chicago, IL, No. ANL-GIF-SO-2018-2 SFR-SO-2018-010.
7.
OECD-NEA
,
2020
, “
Gif 2019 Annual Report, NEA No.7527
,” OECD-NEA, Paris, accessed Aug. 8, 2022, https://www.gen-4.org/gif/jcms/c_119081/gif-2019-annual-report-final-chap4-sfr
8.
Herzog
,
P. J.
,
Chang
,
K. L.
,
Dean
,
M. E.
,
Feldman
,
E. E.
,
Hill
,
J. D.
,
Mohr
,
D.
, and
Planchon
,
P. H.
,
1992
, “
Code Validation With EBR-II Test Data
,” Argonne National Laboratory, Chicago, IL, No. ANL/CP-74826.
9.
IAEA
,
2017
, “
Benchmark Analysis of EBR-II Shutdown Heat Removal Tests
,” IAEA, Vienna, Austria, No. IAEA-TECDOC-1819.
10.
Cheng
,
K. S.
, and
Todreas
,
E. N.
,
1986
, “
Hydrodynamic Models and Correlations for Bare and Wire-Wrapped Hexagonal Rod bundles - Bundle Friction Factors, Subchannel Friction Factors and Mixing Parameters
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
92
(
2
), pp.
227
251
.10.1016/0029-5493(86)90249-9
11.
Fired
,
E.
, and
Idelchik
,
I. E.
,
1989
,
Flow Resistance: A Design Guide for Engineers
,
Hemisphere
,
New York
, p.
385
.
12.
Lyon
,
R. N.
,
1951
, “
Liquid Metal Heat-Transfer Coefficients
,”
Chem. Eng. Prog.
,
47
, pp.
75
79
.
13.
Mikityuk
,
K.
,
2009
, “
Heat Transfer to Liquid Metal: Review of Data and Correlations for Tube Bundles
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
239
(
4
), pp.
680
687
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.12.014
14.
Takashita
,
H.
,
Higuchi
,
M.
,
Togashi
,
N.
, and
Hayashi
,
T.
,
2000
, “
Report on Neutronic Design Calculation Methods
,” Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute, Tokyo, Japan, Report No. JNC TN8410 2000-011 (in Japanese).
15.
Fei
,
T.
,
Mohamed
,
A.
, and
Kim
,
K. T.
,
2013
, “
Neutronics Benchmark Specifications for EBR-II Shutdown Heat Removal Test SHRT-45R
,” Argonne National Laboratory, Chicago, IL, No. ANL-ARC-228(Rev1).
16.
Sumner
,
T.
, and
Wei
,
Y. C. T.
,
2012
, “
Benchmark Specifications and Data Requirements for EBR-II Shutdown Heat Removal Tests SHRT-17 and SHRT-45R
,” Argonne National Laboratory, Chicago, IL, No. ANL-ARC-226(Rev1).
17.
Yoshimura
,
K.
,
Doda
,
N.
,
Fujisaki
,
T.
,
Igawa
,
K.
, and
Tanaka
,
M.
,
2021
, “
Numerical Simulation of Thermal Stratification in Cold Pool during ULOHS Test of U.S. Experimental Fast Reactor EBR-II
,”
Proc. of the 25th National Symposium on Power and Energy Systems
, July 26–27, Paper No.
A131
(in Japanese).
You do not currently have access to this content.