Abstract

This article introduces 55 prompt questions that can be used by design teams to consider the social impacts of the engineered products they develop. These 55 questions were developed by a team of engineers and social scientists to help design teams consider the wide range of social impacts that can result from their design decisions. After their development, these 55 questions were tested in a controlled experiment involving 12 design teams. Given a 1-h period of time, 6 control teams were asked to identify many social impacts within each of the 11 social impact categories identified by Rainock et al. (2018, The Social Impacts of Products: A Review, Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 36, pp. 230241), while 6 treatment groups were asked to do the same while using the 55 questions as prompts to the ideation session. Considering all 1079 social impacts identified by the teams combined and using 99% confidence intervals, the analysis of the data shows that the 55 questions cause teams to more evenly identify high-quality, high-variety, high-novelty impacts across all 11 social impact categories during an ideation session, as opposed to focusing too heavily on a subset of impact categories. The questions (treatment) do this without reducing the quantity, quality, or novelty of impacts identified, compared to the control group. In addition, using a 90% confidence interval, the 55 questions cause teams to more evenly identify impacts when low quality, low variety, and low novelty are not filtered out. As a point of interest, the case where low quality and low variety impacts are removed – but low novelty impacts are not – the treatment draws the same conclusion but with only 85% confidence.

References

1.
Rainock
,
M.
,
Everett
,
D.
,
Pack
,
A.
,
Dahlin
,
E. C.
, and
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
2018
, “
The Social Impacts of Products: A Review
,”
Impact Assess. Project Appraisal
,
36
(
3
), pp.
230
241
.
2.
Marcuse
,
H.
,
1941
, “
Some Social Implications of Modern Technology
,”
Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung
,
9
(
3
), pp.
414
439
.
3.
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
Pack
,
A. T.
,
Lofthouse
,
V.
, and
Bhamra
,
T.
,
2019
, “
Using a Product’s Sustainability Space as a Design Exploration Tool
,”
Design Sci.
,
5
, p.
e1
.
4.
Cf
,
O. D. D. S.
, “
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
,”
United Nations, New York
.
5.
Burleson
,
G.
,
Lajoie
,
J.
,
Mabey
,
C.
,
Sours
,
P.
,
Ventrella
,
J.
,
Peiffer
,
E.
,
Stine
,
E.
,
Stettler Kleine
,
M.
,
MacDonald
,
L.
,
Austin-Breneman
,
J.
,
Javernick-Will
,
A.
,
Winter
,
A.
,
Lucena
,
J.
,
Knight
,
D.
,
Daniel
,
S.
,
Thomas
,
E.
,
Mattson
,
C.
, and
Aranda
,
I.
,
2023
, “
Advancing Sustainable Development: Emerging Factors and Futures for the Engineering Field
,”
Sustainability
,
15
(
20
), p.
7869
.
6.
Ottosson
,
H. J.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
, and
Dahlin
,
E. C.
,
2020
, “
Analysis of Perceived Social Impacts of Existing Products Designed for the Developing World, With Implications for New Product Development
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
142
(
5
), p.
051101
.
7.
Pack
,
A. T.
,
Rose Phipps
,
E.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
, and
Dahlin
,
E. C.
,
2020
, “
Social Impact in Product Design, an Exploration of Current Industry Practices
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
142
(
7
), p.
071702
.
8.
Armstrong
,
A. G.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
Salmon
,
J. L.
, and
Dahlin
,
E. C.
,
2021
, “
FMEA-Inspired Analysis for Social Impact of Engineered Products
,”
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Virtual, Online
,
Aug. 17–19
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, p.
V03BT03A017
.
9.
Stevenson
,
P. D.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
, and
Dahlin
,
E. C.
,
2020
, “
A Method for Creating Product Social Impact Models of Engineered Products
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
142
(
4
), p.
041101
.
10.
Thomas
,
E.
,
Wilson
,
D.
,
Kathuni
,
S.
,
Libey
,
A.
,
Chintalapati
,
P.
, and
Coyle
,
J.
,
2021
, “
A Contribution to Drought Resilience in East Africa Through Groundwater Pump Monitoring Informed by In-Situ Instrumentation, Remote Sensing and Ensemble Machine Learning
,”
Sci. Total. Environ.
,
780
, p.
146486
.
11.
Stringham
,
B. J.
, and
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
2021
, “
Design of Remote Data Collection Devices for Social Impact Indicators of Products in Developing Countries
,”
Develop. Eng.
,
6
, p.
100062
.
12.
Kiesling
,
E.
,
Günther
,
M.
,
Stummer
,
C.
, and
Wakolbinger
,
L. M.
,
2012
, “
Agent-Based Simulation of Innovation Diffusion: A Review
,”
Central Eur. J. Oper. Res.
,
20
, pp.
183
230
.
13.
Mabey
,
C. S.
,
Armstrong
,
A. G.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
Salmon
,
J. L.
,
Hatch
,
N. W.
, and
Dahlin
,
E. C.
,
2021
, “
A Computational Simulation-Based Framework for Estimating Potential Product Impact During Product Design
,”
Design Sci.
,
7
, p.
e15
.
14.
Bartlett
,
K. G.
,
1947
, “
Social Impact of the Radio
,”
Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci.
,
250
(
1
), pp.
89
97
.
15.
Starr
,
C.
,
1969
, “
Social Benefit Versus Technological Risk: What Is Our Society Willing to Pay for Safety
?”
Science
,
165
(
3899
), pp.
1232
1238
.
16.
Keeney
,
R. L.
,
1980
, “
Evaluating Alternatives Involving Potential Fatalities
,”
Oper. Res.
,
28
(
1
), pp.
188
205
.
17.
Slovic
,
P.
,
Lichtenstein
,
S.
, and
Fischhoff
,
B.
,
1984
, “
Modeling the Societal Impact of Fatal Accidents
,”
Manag. Sci.
,
30
(
4
), pp.
464
474
.
18.
von Neumann
,
J.
, and
Morgenstern
,
O.
,
1944
,
Theory of Games and Economic behavior
,
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
.
19.
Sachs
,
J. D.
,
2012
, “
From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals
,”
Lancet
,
379
(
9832
), pp.
2206
2211
.
20.
Labuschagne
,
C.
, and
Brent
,
A.
,
2006
, “
Social Indicators for Sustainable Project and Technology Life Cycle Management in the Process Industry (13 Pp+ 4)
,”
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
,
11
, pp.
3
15
.
21.
Labuschagne
,
C.
,
Brent
,
A. C.
, and
Van Erck
,
R. P. G.
,
2005
, “
Assessing the Sustainability Performances of Industries
,”
J. Cleaner. Prod.
,
13
(
4
), pp.
373
385
.
22.
Labuschagne
,
C.
,
Brent
,
A. C.
, and
Claasen
,
S. J.
,
2005
, “
Environmental and Social Impact Considerations for Sustainable Project Life Cycle Management in the Process Industry
,”
Corporate Soc. Responsibility Environmental Manag.
,
12
(
1
), pp.
38
54
.
23.
Hutchins
,
M. J.
, and
Sutherland
,
J. W.
,
2008
, “
An Exploration of Measures of Social Sustainability and Their Application to Supply Chain Decisions
,”
J. Cleaner. Prod.
,
16
(
15
), pp.
1688
1698
.
24.
Bai
,
C.
, and
Sarkis
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Integrating Sustainability Into Supplier Selection With Grey System and Rough Set Methodologies
,”
Int. J. Production Econ.
,
124
(
1
), pp.
252
264
.
25.
Rojanamon
,
P.
,
Chaisomphob
,
T.
, and
Bureekul
,
T.
,
2009
, “
Application of Geographical Information System to Site Selection of Small Run-of-River Hydropower Project by Considering Engineering/Economic/Environmental Criteria and Social Impact
,”
Renewable. Sustainable. Energy. Rev.
,
13
(
9
), pp.
2336
2348
.
26.
Sabini
,
L.
,
Muzio
,
D.
, and
Alderman
,
N.
,
2019
, “
25 Years of ‘sustainable Projects’. What We Know and What the Literature Says
,”
Int. J. Project Manag.
,
37
(
6
), pp.
820
838
.
27.
Armstrong
,
A. G.
,
Suk
,
H.
,
Mabey
,
C. S.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
Hall
,
J.
, and
Salmon
,
J. L.
,
2023
, “
Systematic Review and Classification of the Engineering for Global Development Literature Based on Design Tools and Methods for Social Impact Consideration
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
145
(
3
), p.
030801
.
28.
Costanza-Chock
,
S.
,
2020
,
Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need
,
The MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
.
29.
Das
,
M.
,
Roeder
,
G.
,
Ostrowski
,
A. K.
,
Yang
,
M. C.
, and
Verma
,
A.
,
2022
, “
What Do We Mean When We Write About Ethics, Equity, and Justice in Engineering Design
?”
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
St. Louis, MO
,
Aug. 14–17
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, p.
V006T06A036
.
30.
Petti
,
L.
,
Serreli
,
M.
, and
Di Cesare
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Systematic Literature Review in Social Life Cycle Assessment
,”
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
,
23
, pp.
422
431
.
31.
Frey
,
D. D.
, and
Dym
,
C. L.
,
2006
, “
Validation of Design Methods: Lessons From Medicine
,”
Res. Eng. Design
,
17
, pp.
45
57
.
32.
Krippendorff
,
K.
,
2018
,
Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology
,
SAGE Publications
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
.
You do not currently have access to this content.