This paper presents a method of performing Life Cycle Energy Analysis (LCEA) for the purpose of material selection. The method applies product analysis methods to the evaluation of material options for automotive components. Specifically, LCEA is used to compare material options for a bumper-reinforcing beam on a 1030 kg vehicle. In this analysis, glass fiber composites and high-strength steel beams result in the lowest life cycle energy consumption. This paper also presents a set of life cycle energy terms designed to clearly distinguish between energy consumption occurring during different phases of a product’s life cycle. In addition, this paper compares the results of the LCEA method to those of other energy analyses and demonstrates how different methods of varying thoroughness can result in different material selections. Finally, opportunities are identified for extending this type of analysis beyond both automotive components and energy consumption. In particular, this paper identifies the need to develop similar methods for other environmental indicators.

1.
Mangonon, P. L., 1999, The Principles of Materials Selection for Engineering Design, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
2.
Ashby, M. F., 1992, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Pergamon Press, New York, NY.
3.
ASM, 1997, ASM Handbook, Vol. 20, Materials Selection and Design, American Society for Materials.
4.
Dieter, G. E., 1997, “Overview of Material Selection Process,” ASM Handbook, Vol. 20, Materials Selection and Design, pp. 243–254.
5.
Dixon, J. R., and Poli, C., 1995, Engineering Design and Design for Manufacturing, Field Stone Publishers, Conway, MA.
6.
Ashby, M. F., 1997, “Performance Indices,” ASM Handbook, Vol. 20, Materials Selection and Design, pp. 281–290.
7.
Granta Design, 2003, Cambridge Engineering Selector, http://www.grantadesign.com.
8.
Ishii, K., 1996, “Materials Selection Issues in Design for Recyclability,” Proceedings of the Second International Ecobalance Conference, Tsukuba, Japan.
9.
Graedel, T. E., and Allenby, B. R., 1996, Design for Environment, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
10.
Wegst, G. K., and Ashby, M. F., 1998, “The Development and Use of a Methodology for the Environmentally-Conscious Selection of Materials,” Proceedings of the Third World Conference on Integrated Design and Process Technology (IDPT), Vol. 5, pp. 88–93.
11.
Clark, J. P., Roth, R., and Field, F. R., 1997, “Techno-Economic Issues in Materials Selection,” ASM Handbook, Vol. 20, Materials Selection and Design, pp. 255–265.
12.
Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL), 1992, The EPS Enviro-Accounting Method: An Application of Environmental Accounting Principles for Valuation of Environmental Impact in Product Design, Swedish Waste Research Council.
13.
Halada, K., Ijima, K., and Yaga, K., 1997, “Database for MCLA (Materials Environmental Life Cycle Analysis),” Computerization and Networking of Materials Databases: Fifth Volume, ASTM STP 1311, S. Nishijima and S. Iwata, eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 171–188.
14.
Linton
,
J. D.
,
2002
, “
DEA: A Method for Ranking the Greeness of Design Decisions
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
124
, pp.
145
150
.
15.
Baitz, M., Saur, K., Kreia^ig, J., 1997, “Life-Cycle-Engineering: Requirements and Limitations of Indicator and DFE-Tools,” Proceedings of the Eco-Indicators for Products and Materials-State of Play ’97: An International Workshop, Natural Resources Canada.
16.
Kampe, S. L., 2001, “Incorporating Green Engineering in Materials Selection and Design,” Proceedings of the 2001 Green Engineering Conference: Sustainable and Environmentally-Conscious Engineering, Virginia Tech’s College of Engineering and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Roanoke, VA.
17.
Boustead, I., and Hancock, G. F., 1979, Handbook of Industrial Energy Analysis, Ellis Horwood Ltd., West Sussex, England.
18.
Brown, H. L., Hamel, B. B., and Hedman, B. A., 1996, Energy Analysis of 108 Industrial Processes, The Fairmont Press, Inc., Lilburn, GA.
19.
Chapman, P. F., and Roberts, F., 1983, Metal Resources and Energy, Butterworth & Co. Ltd., London, England.
20.
E. P. A., 1993, Life Cycle Assessment: Inventory Principles and Guidelines, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-92/245.
21.
Sullivan, J. L., and Hu, J., 1995, “Life Cycle Energy Analysis for Automobiles,” Society of Automotive Engineers, 951829.
22.
Wheeler, M. A., 1982, “Lightweight Materials and Life Cycle Energy Use,” Society of Automotive Engineers, 820148.
23.
Stephens, R. D., Keoleian, G. A., Spatari, S., Beal, R., and Williams, R. L., 1998, “Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Plastic and Steel Vehicle Fuel Tanks,” Society of Automotive Engineers, 982224.
24.
Gibson, T. L., 2000, “Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Materials for Automotive Applications,” Society of Automotive Engineers, 2000-01-1486.
25.
ISO, 1997, “Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis,” International Organization for Standards.
26.
Sauer, B. J. and Franklin, W. E., 1997, “How to Perform a Life Cycle Inventory,” Society of Automotive Engineers, 971208.
27.
Ecoinvent, 2004, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, http://www.ecoinvent.ch/.
28.
US LCI Database Project, 2004, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, http://www.nrel.gov/lci/.
29.
Hedemann, J. and Meinshausen, I., translated by Frischkneckt, 2003, “Ecoinvent 2000—Documentation EcoSpold,” Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Duebendorf, CH, http://www.ecoinvent.ch/.
30.
Sullivan, J. L., Williams, R. L., Yester, S., Cobas-Flores, E., Chubbs, S. T., Hentges, S. G., and Pomper, S. D., 1998, “Life Cycle Inventory of a Generic U.S. Family Sedan—Overview of Results USCAR AMP Project,” Society of Automotive Engineers, 982160.
31.
Vigon, B. W., Tolle, D. A., Cornaby, B. W., Latham, H. C., Harrison, C. L., Boguski, T. L., Hunt, R. G., Sellers, J. D., and U.S.E.P.A. Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, 1994, Life Cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principles, Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI.
32.
PTAI, 1994, “Automotive Bumpers 1994—Materials, Manufacturing, Economics,” private multi-client study, Phillip Townsend Associates, Inc., Houston, TX.
33.
AISI, 2001, “Steel Bumper Systems for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks,” American Iron and Steel Institute.
34.
Baskette, C., Chaudhury, M., Crawford, A., Garvin, L., Horning, A., Lair, H., and Manternach, J., 1999, “Ford Sustainability Metrics,” Report from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
35.
IDEMAT Database, 2003, T.U. Delft, http://www.io.tudelft.nl/research/dfs/idemat/.
36.
Franklin Associates, 2003, The Franklin Database, developed and maintained by Franklin Associates, Ltd., Praire Village, KS.
37.
SimaPro Software, PRe´ Consultants, http://www.pre.nl/simapro/default.htm.
38.
GaBi Software, Institute for Polymer Testing and Polymer Science, http://www.gabi-software.com/.
You do not currently have access to this content.