Continuous backbone robots driven by cables have many potential applications in dexterous manipulation for manufacturing and space environments. Design of these robots requires specification of a stiff yet bendable backbone, selection of cable support heights and spacings, and development of a cable drive system. The robot arm divides into sections that are subdivided into segments bounded by cable supports. Cable pairs attach to the end of each section and provide two axis bending. Thus, with many sections, the arm can be bent into complex shapes to allow redundant positioning of the end effector payload. The kinematics of the entire arm are determined from the segment kinematics. This paper derives and numerically solves the nonlinear kinematics for a single segment of a continuous backbone robot. Optimal spacing of the cable supports maximizes displacement, load capacity, and simplicity of the robot kinematics. An experimental system verifies the theoretically predicted performance.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
robot kinematics, industrial manipulators, design engineering, bending, dexterous manipulators
Topics:
Cables, Design, Displacement, Kinematics, Robots, Stress, Tension, Robot kinematics
1.
Baillieul, J., 1985, “Kinematic Programming Alternatives for Redundant Manipulators,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, March 25–28, pp. 722–728.
2.
Carignan
,
R. Craig
,
1991
, “
Trajectory Optimization for Kinematically Redundant Arms
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
,
8
, No.
2
, pp.
221
–
248
.
3.
Robinson, G., and Davies, J. B. C., 1999, “Continuum Robots—A State of the Art,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2849–2854.
4.
Hirose S., 1993, “Biologically Inspired Robots,” Oxford University Press.
5.
Koren
,
Y.
, and
Shan
,
Y.
,
1993
, “
Design and Motion Planning of a Mechanical Snake
,”
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.
,
23
, No.
4
, pp.
1091
–
1100
.
6.
Kyriakopoulos
,
K. J.
,
Migadis
,
G.
, and
Sarrigeorgidis
,
K.
,
1999
, “
The NTUA Snake Design, Planar Kinematics, and Motion Planning
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
,
16
, No.
1
, pp.
37
–
72
.
7.
Chirikjian
,
G. S.
, and
Burdick
,
J. W.
,
1994
, “
A Model Approach to Hyperredundant Manipulator Kinematics
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
10
, No.
3
, pp.
343
–
354
.
8.
Chirikjian
,
G. S.
, and
Burdick
,
J. W.
,
1994
, “
The Kinematics of Hyperredundant Robot Locomotion
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
11
, No.
6
, pp.
781
–
793
.
9.
Burdick
,
J. W.
,
Radford
,
J.
, and
Chirikjian
,
G. S.
,
1995
, “
A Sidewinding Locomotion Gait for Hyperredundant Robots
,”
Advanced Robotics
,
9
, No.
3
, pp.
195
–
216
.
10.
Walker, I., and Hannan, M., 1999, “A Novel Elephant’s Trunk Robot,” AIM’99, Piran-Portoroz, Slovenia, pp. 410–415.
11.
Hannan, M., and Walker, I., 2000, “Novel Kinematics for Continuum Robots,” 7th International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics, Piran-Portoroz, Slovenia.
12.
Stoker, J. J. “Differential Geometry,” 1969, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
13.
Love, A. E. H., 1944, “A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity,” Dover Publications, New York.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.