Proper modeling of joint clearance is of great importance in the analysis and design of multibody mechanical systems. The clearance may be due to wear or imperfection in manufacturing. When there is no lubricant in the clearance, solid-to-solid contact occurs. The impulse due to contact between the links is transmitted throughout the system. The presence of a lubricant avoids such contact, as the hydrodynamic forces developed by the lubricant film support the loads acting on the bodies and prevent the bodies from coming into contact. In this paper, an analysis of revolute joint clearances in multibody mechanical systems with and without lubricant is presented. Squeeze as well as viscous effects are considered utilizing the hydrodynamic theory of lubrication in long bearings. Unlike the traditional machine design approach, the instantaneous lubricant forces are the unknown and evaluated in terms of the known geometrical position and velocity of the journal and bearing. In the case of analysis of a joint clearance with no lubricant, a modified Hertzian relation is used to model the impact or contact between the journal and bearing, which includes a hysteresis damping term to account for the energy dissipation during impact. The methodology is applied for the analysis of a slider-crank mechanism having a clearance in the piston pin. The simulations are carried out with and without lubricant and the results are compared. It is shown that the lubricant results in a steady motion with fewer peaks in the required cranking moment for the system. [S1050-0472(00)01804-3]

1.
Lankarani
,
H. M.
, and
Nikravesh
,
P. E.
,
1994
, “
Continuous Contact Force Models for Impact Analysis in Multibody Systems
,”
Nonlinear Dyn.
,
5
, pp.
193
207
.
2.
Shivaswamy, S., 1997, “Modeling Contact Forces and Energy Dissipation during Impact in Multibody Mechanical Systems,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS.
3.
Timoshenko, S., and Goodier, J. N., 1970, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, NY.
4.
Lankarani
,
H. M.
, and
Nikravesh
,
P. E.
,
1990
, “
A Contact Force Model with Hysteresis Damping for Impact Analysis of Multibody Systems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
112
, pp.
369
376
.
5.
Khulief
,
Y. A.
, and
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1987
, “
A Continuous Force Model for the Impact Analysis of Flexible Mutibody Systems
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
22
, pp.
213
224
.
6.
Goldsmith, W., 1960, Impact, the Theory and Physical Behavior of Colliding Solids, E. Arnold Ltd., London.
7.
Dubowsky
,
S.
, and
Freudenstein
,
F.
,
1971
, “
Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems with Clearances, Part 1: Formulation of Dynamic Model
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
93
, pp.
305
309
.
8.
Dubowsky
,
S.
, and
Freudenstein
,
F.
,
1971
, “
Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems with Clearances, Part 2: Dynamic Response
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
93
, pp.
310
316
.
9.
Deck
,
J. F.
, and
Dubowsky
,
S.
,
1994
, “
On the Limitations of Predictions of the Dynamic Response of Machines with Clearance Connections
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
, pp.
833
841
.
10.
Gu, L., Dubowsky, S., and Mavroidis, C., 1998, “The Design Implication of Chaotic and Near Chaotic Vibrations in Machines,” Proc. 1998 ASME Design Technical Conferences, Atlanta, GA.
11.
Ravn, P., 1998, “Analysis and Synthesis of Planar Mechanical Systems Including Flexibility, Contact and Joint Clearance,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Report No. S 78, DCAMM, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
12.
Pinkus, O., and Sternlicht, S. A., 1961, Theory of Hydrodynamic Lubrication, McGraw-Hill, NY.
13.
Norton, R. L., 1996, Machine Design-an Integrated Approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14.
Nikravesh, P. E., 1998, Computer Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
You do not currently have access to this content.