In the early 1980s, Siemens developed a last stage fast rotating condensation blading (SK) blade with strongly twisted and tapered profiles for industrial condensing steam turbines, which operate with variable speed under high steam mass flow and excessive condensing pressures. To suppress alternating stresses of the lowest blade resonances, conical friction bolts are loosely mounted at the upper parts of adjacent airfoils. Also, these bolts couple the rotating blades, since steam excitation is lower than the friction threshold force on the bolt contacts. These coupling and damping capabilities were proven experimentally for the smallest SK blade at the test rig of the real turbine. By considering the similar mechanical and aerodynamic characteristics based on the tested smallest airfoil, the entire SK-blade family has been scaled up for reliable utilization in more than 500 industrial turbines operating for diverse ranges of power and speed. A recent trend to very large compression units, like gas to liquids, acid terephtalic, or methanol plants, imposes a need for further enlargement of the SK-blade family and its friction bolt, whose mechanical properties have been proven experimentally for the smallest airfoil. In this paper, the mechanical capabilities of the smallest and large SK blades coupled by the bolts are verified by using the finite element (FE) method. The static analyses with friction sliding on airfoil interfaces and the linear dynamic behavior of tuned disk assemblies are considered. The FE mesh quality and the proper boundary conditions at the radial fork root are accomplished by getting good agreements between the computed and measured resonance frequencies of the large freestanding blade at standstill. The validated mesh refinement and root boundary conditions are used further in all numerical FE analyses. For the large SK-disk assembly under spin-pit conditions, the obtained FE results are in very good agreement with the experimental Campbell diagrams, which are measured with the three gauges that also identify the stick-slip and stuck bolt’s contact conditions. Concerning the gauge outputs and the FE steady-state blade resonances computed for the analytically determined air jet excitation, the experimental spin-pit results demonstrate that the bolts are mainly in stuck contact conditions. Only in very narrow frequency ranges around resonance peaks, microslips on the bolts occur due to the resonance amplification of blade vibrations. This is proven indirectly by comparison of the overall damping values evaluated from the blade resonances at standstill and in the spin pit. The described linear dynamic concept assesses properly static stresses and free vibrations of the scaled disk assembly with friction bolts. For the steam excitation, which generates dynamic contact reactions bigger than the friction threshold forces, the realistic blade responses need to be obtained from the blade simulation with friction (Szwedowicz, J., Secall-Wimmel, T., and Duenck-Kerst, P., 2007, “Damping Performance of Axial Turbine Stages With Loosely Assembled Friction Bolts; the Non-Linear Dynamic Assessment; Part II,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2007, Montreal, Canada, May 14–17, ASME Paper No. GT2007-27506).

1.
Brandt
,
D. E.
, and
Wesorick
,
R. R.
, 1994, “
GE Gas Turbine Design Philosophy
,” GE Power Generation Marketing No. GER-3434D.
2.
Eckardt
,
D.
, and
Rufli
,
P.
, 2002, “
Advanced Gas Turbine Technology: ABB/BCC Historical Firsts
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
124
, pp.
542
549
.
3.
Diakunchak
,
I. S.
,
Gaul
,
G. R.
,
McQuiggan
,
G.
, and
Southall
,
L. R.
, 2002, “
Siemens Westinghouse Advanced Turbine Systems Program Final Summary
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002-30654.
4.
Maekawa
,
A.
,
Magoshi
,
R.
, and
Iwasaki
,
Y.
, 2003, “
Development and In-House Shop Load Test Results of M701G2 Gas Turbine
,”
Proceedings of the International Gas Turbine Congress
,
Tokyo
, Nov. 2–7, Paper No. IGTC2003, Tokyo-TS-100.
5.
Hohn
,
A.
, 1974, “
Steam Turbines for Industrial and Medium Sized Power Plants
,” BBC No. CH-T 010122 D/E, Baden, Switzerland, pp.
39
56
.
6.
Pollak
,
H.
,
Pfitzinger
,
E.-W.
,
Thamm
,
N.
, and
Schwarz
,
M.-A.
, 2004, “
Design and Materials for Modern Steam Turbines With Two Cylinder Design up to 700MW
,”
Proceedings of Power-Gen 2004 (PG04) Conference
,
Barcelona, Spain
, May 25–27.
7.
Green
,
J. S.
, and
Fransson
,
T. H.
, 2006, “
Scaling of Turbine Blade Unsteady Pressures for Rapid Forced Response Assessment
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90613.
8.
Swanekamp
,
R.
, 2000, “
Gas Turbines, Combined Cycles Harvest Record Orders
,” Power Magazine, Vol.
144
, No.
2
.
9.
Wan
,
E. S.
,
Crimi
,
P.
,
Scheibel
,
J.
, and
Viswanathan
,
R.
, 2002, “
Combustion Turbine F-Class Life Management of 1st Stage Turbine Blades
,” ASME Paper No. TE02.
10.
Reimann
,
P.
, 2000, “
Stretching the Size of Geothermal Steam Turbines
,”
Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress 2000
,
Kyushu-Tohoku, Japan
, May 28–Jun. 10, pp.
3283
3288
.
11.
Szwedowicz
,
J.
,
Secall-Wimmel
,
T.
, and
Duenck-Kerst
,
P.
, 2007, “
Damping Performance of Axial Turbine Stages With Loosely Assembled Friction Bolts; the Non-Linear Dynamic Assessment; Part II
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27506.
12.
2005, ABAQUS User’s Manual, Version 6.5, ABAQUS Inc., Pawtucket, RI.
13.
Szwedowicz
,
J.
,
Visser
,
R.
,
Sextro
,
W.
, and
Masserey
,
P. A.
, 2003, “
On Forced Vibrations of Shrouded Turbine Blades
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38808.
14.
Panning
,
L.
,
Popp
,
K.
,
Sextro
,
W.
,
Goetting
,
F.
,
Kayser
,
A.
, and
Wolter
,
I.
, 2004, “
Asymmetrical Underplatform Dampers in Gas Turbine Bladings: Theory and Application
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53316.
15.
Wachter
,
J.
,
Pfeiffer
,
R.
, and
Jarosch
,
J.
, 1983, “
Experimental Study to Gain Insight in the Vibration Characteristics of a Steam Turbine LP-Wheel With Lashing Pins
,”
The Ninth Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise
,
Dearborn, MI
, Sept. 11–14, ASME Paper No. 83-72174, pp.
83
89
.
16.
Szwedowicz
,
J.
, 1999, “
Cyclic Finite Element Modeling of Shrouded Turbine Blades Including Frictional Contact
,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-92.
17.
Szwedowicz
,
J.
,
Slowik
,
S.
,
Mahler
,
A.
, and
Hulme
,
C. J.
, 2005, “
Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses of a Gas Turbine Blade for Attainment of Reliable Shroud Coupling
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-69062.
18.
Thomas
,
D. L.
, 1974, “
Standing Waves in Rotationally Periodic Structures
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
37
, pp.
288
290
.
19.
Dickmann
,
H.-P.
,
Secall-Wimmel
,
T.
,
Szwedowicz
,
J.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
, and
Roduner
,
C.
, 2006, “
Unsteady Flow in a Turbocharger Centrifugal Compressor—3D-CFD-Simulation and Numerical Analysis of Impeller Blade Vibration
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
128
(
3
), pp.
455
465
.
20.
Filsinger
,
D.
,
Szwedowicz
,
J.
, and
Schäfer
,
O.
, 2002, “
Approach to Unidirectional Coupled CFD-FEM Analysis of Axial Turbocharger Turbine Blades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
125
131
.
21.
Zeng
,
F. L.
, 1991, “
On Adaptive Finite Element Procedures for Static and Dynamic Problems
,” Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden.
22.
Fischer
,
C.
, 2003, “
Experimentelle Modalanalyse SK-Schaufeltyp (Einspannung frei/frei)
,” Siemens Intern Bericht S329/2003/008, Müllheim, Nov.
23.
Jarosch
,
J.
, 1983, “
Beitrag zum Schwingungsverhalten gekoppelter Schaufelsystem
,” Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Stuttgart, Stuttgart.
24.
Szwedowicz
,
J.
,
Senn
,
S. M.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2002, “
Optimum Strain Gage Application to Bladed Assemblies
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
606
613
.
25.
Matveev
,
V. V.
,
Chaikoskii
,
B. S.
, and
Rzhavin
,
L. N.
, 1970, “
Damping Capacity of the Hinged Locking Joint of Turbomachine Compressor Blades (in Russian)
,”
Problemy Prochnosti
,
12
, pp.
106
109
.
26.
Pfeiffer
,
R.
, 1985, “
Einfluss Unterschiedlicher Paketierungen auf Schwingungsverhalten und Verbundfaktoren von Dampfturbinen-Beschaufelungen (Influence of Different Arrangements of Steam Turbine Blades in Packet on Disc Coupling and Vibration Behavior)
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart.
27.
Whitehead
,
D. S.
, 1988, “
The Maximum Factor by Which Forced Vibration of Blades Can Increase Due to Mistuning
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
120
, pp.
115
119
.
You do not currently have access to this content.