Abstract

Traditionally, for complicated systems, such as a gas turbine power plant, maintenance cost and online availability are two of the most important concerns to the equipment owner. However, in the deregulated electric power market, cost and reliability are not the only concerns. The ultimate goal is to maximize plant profitability, and this requires the evaluation of many different factors, including system performance, the aging and reliability of equipment, maintenance practices, and market dynamics accounting for the price and availability of fuel as well as the generation of revenues in competing markets. Thus, gas turbine power plant planning optimization is a complex problem, and comprehensive operational modeling and optimization methods are required. In this paper, a profit-based power plant outage planning approach is presented that reflects the new challenges posed by deregulation. Specifically, particular attention is paid to modeling power plant aging, performance degradation, reliability deterioration, and, importantly, the energy market dynamics. A multiple time-scale method is developed for coupled short-term, long-term generation scheduling and outage planning for this profit-based outage planning approach. The procedure is implemented for a base load combined cycle power plant with a single gas turbine, with the results demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed approach.

1.
Hoeft
,
R.
,
Janawitz
,
J.
, and
Keck
,
R.
, 2003, “
GER3620J-Heavy Duty Gas Turbine Operating and Maintenance Considerations
,” General Electric Energy.
2.
Kelly
,
A.
, 1997,
Maintenance Strategy
,
Reed Educational and Professional Publishing
, Oxford, Boston.
3.
Smith
,
D. J.
, 2003, “
Unit Availability not Affected by Extending Outage Cycles
,”
Power Eng. J.
0950-3366,
107
(
3
), pp.
38
42
.
4.
Tarbet
,
M.
,
Takacs
,
L.
, and
Sipos
,
S.
, 1996, “
Optimizing the Interval for Turbine Generator Inspection Outages
,” ASME Joint Power Generation Conferences, ASME PWR-Vol.
30
.
5.
Dewey
,
R.
,
Roemer
,
M.
,
Pollard
,
M.
, and
McCloskey
,
T.
, 1998, “
Optimization of Outage Interval for a Large Steam Turbine Unit
,” ASME International Joint Power Generation Conference, ASME PWR-Vol.
33
.
6.
Latcovich
,
J.
, and
Tanner
,
M.
, 1998, “
Steam Turbine Risk Assessment Program (STRAP): Managing Steam Turbine Risk in Critical Applications
,” ASME International Joint Power Generation Conference, ASME PWR-Vol.
33
.
7.
Endrenyi
,
J.
,
Aboresheid
,
S.
, et al.
, 2001, “
The Present Status of Maintenance Strategies and the Impact of Maintenance on Reliability
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
0885-8950,
16
(
4
).
8.
Sllva
,
P.
,
Campanari
,
S.
, and
Macchi
,
E.
, 2003, “
Optimization of Operating Conditions and Compressor Cleaning Time Intervals of Combined Cycles in a Liberalized Market
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2003
,
ASME
,
New York
, ASME Paper No. GT2003-38455.
9.
Shahidehpour
,
M.
,
Yamin
,
H.
, and
Li
,
Z.
, 2002,
Market Operations in Electric Power Systems: Forecasting, Scheduling, and Risk Management
,
Wiley
, New York.
10.
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Volovoi
,
V.
,
Waters
,
M.
, and
Mavris
,
D.
, 2005, “
An Integrated Framework for Power Plant Operational Modeling and Optimization
,” ASME Paper No. GT 2005-69009.
11.
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Volovoi
,
V.
,
Waters
,
M.
, and
Mavris
,
D.
, 2006, “
A Sequential Approach for Gas Turbine Power Plant Preventive Maintenance Scheduling
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
128
, pp.
796
805
.
12.
Diakunchak
I. S.
, 1991, “
Performance Degradation in Industrial Gas Turbines
,” ASME Paper No. 91-GT-228.
13.
Gertsbakh
,
I.
, 2000,
Reliability Theory With Applications to Preventive Maintenance
,
Springer
, New York.
14.
Hussain
,
K.
, 1991, “
Solution Method for Unit Commitment Limitations and Utility Constraints
,”
IEEE Comput. Appl. Power
,
4
(
1
), pp.
16
20
.
15.
Guan
,
X.
,
Zhai
,
Q.
, and
Papalexopoulos
,
A.
, 2003, “
Optimization Based Methods for Unit Commitment: Lagrangian Relaxation Versus General Mixed Integer Programming
,”
IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting
, July 13–17,
IEEE
,
New York
, Vol.
2
.
16.
Frauendorfer
,
K.
,
Glavitsch
,
H.
, and
Bacher
,
R.
, eds., 1993,
Optimization in Planning and Operation of Electric Power Systems
,
Springer-Verlag
, Berlin.
17.
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Volovoi
,
V.
,
Waters
,
M.
, and
Mavris
,
D.
, 2004, “
Power Plant Systems Operational Scheduling Using A Dual-Time Scale
,” 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, New York.
18.
Nixon
,
J. N.
,
Waters
,
M.
, and
Mavris
,
D.
, 2003, “
An Evaluation of the Effect of Ambient Conditions on the Integration of Inlet Conditioning Systems with Industrial Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME Turbo Expo Proceedings
,
ASME
,
New York
, Vol.
2
, pp.
821
832
.
19.
Volovoi
,
V.
, 2006, “
Stochastic Petri Nets Modeling Using SPN@
,” Proceedings of RAMS-2006 Symposium, Newport Beach, CA, January 26–29, Paper No. 2006RM-166.
You do not currently have access to this content.