The flow behavior through a brush seal has been investigated by developing a flow analysis procedure with a porous medium approach. In order to increase the brush seal performance and use at more severe operating conditions, the complex flow in the bristle pack has become the major concern affecting seal features such as blow-down, hang-up, hysteresis, and bristle flutter. In this study, an axisymmetric CFD model is employed to calibrate anisotropic permeability coefficients for the bristle pack based on available experimental data: leakage, axial pressure on the rotor surface, and radial pressure on the backing plate. A simplified form of the force balance equation is introduced for the flow in the porous bristle pack. Different sets of permeability coefficients are defined for the fence height region below the seal backing plate and the upper region of the seal to correlate the different physical structures and behavior of these regions during operation. The upper region is subject to more stiffening due to backing plate support while the fence height region is free to spread and bend in the axial direction. It is found that flow resistance for the upper region should be 20% higher than the fence height region in order to match the experimental pressure within the bristle pack. Analysis results prove that the brush seal is well represented as a porous medium with this approach. Based on the model developed, characteristic flow and pressure fields in the entire bristle pack have been explored.

1.
Ferguson, J. G., 1988, “Brushes as High Performance Gas Turbine Seals,” ASME paper no. 88-GT-182.
2.
Gorelov
,
G. M.
,
Reznik
,
V. E.
, and
Tsibizov
,
V. I.
,
1988
, “
Experimental Study of Brush Seal Flow Characteristics and Comparison With a Labyrinth Seal
,”
Izv. VUZ. Aviatsionnaya Tekhnika
,
31
, No.
4
, pp.
43
46
(Allerton Press).
3.
Chupp
,
R. E.
, and
Nelson
,
P.
,
1993
, “
Evaluation of Brush Seals for Limited-Life Engines
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
9
, No.
1
, pp.
113
118
.
4.
Chupp
,
R. E.
, and
Dowler
,
C. A.
,
1993
, “
Performance Characteristics of Brush Seals for Limited-Life Engines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
115
, pp.
390
396
.
5.
Carlile
,
J. A.
,
Hendricks
,
R. C.
, and
Yoder
,
D. A.
,
1993
, “
Brush Seal Leakage Performance With Gaseous Working Fluids at Static and Low Rotor Speed Conditions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
115
, pp.
397
403
.
6.
Chupp, R. E., Aksit, M. F., Ghasripoor, F., Turnquist, N. A., and Demiroglu, M., 2001, “Advanced Seals for Industrial Turbine Applications,” AIAA paper no. 2001-3626.
7.
Dinc
,
S.
,
Demiroglu
,
M.
,
Turnquist
,
N.
,
Mortzheim
,
J.
,
Goetze
,
G.
,
Maupin
,
J.
,
Hopkins
,
J.
,
Wolfe
,
C.
, and
Florin
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Fundamental Design Issues of Brush Seals for Industrial Applications
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
, pp.
293
300
.
8.
O’Neil, A. T., Hogg, S. I., Withers, P. A., Turner, M. T., and Jones, T. V., 1997, “Multiple Brush Seals in Series,” ASME paper no. 97-GT-194.
9.
Braun, M., Hendricks, R., and Canacci, V., 1990, “Flow Visualization in a Simulated Brush Seal,” ASME paper no. 90-GT-217.
10.
Braun
,
M. J.
,
Canacci
,
V. A.
, and
Hendricks
,
R. C.
,
1991
, “
Flow Visualization and Quantitative Velocity and Pressure Measurements in Simulated Single and Double Brush Seals
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
34
, pp.
70
80
.
11.
Braun, M., Canacci, V., and Hendricks, R., 1990, “Flow Visualization and Motion Analysis for a Series of Four Sequential Brush Seals,” AIAA paper no. 90-2482.
12.
Braun, M., Hendricks, R., and Yang, Y., 1991, “Effects of Brush Seal Morphology on Leakage and Pressure Drops,” AIAA paper no. 91-2106.
13.
Mullen, R., Braun, M., and Hendricks, R., 1990, “Numerical Modeling of Flows in Simulated Brush Seal Configurations,” AIAA paper no. 90-2141.
14.
Braun, M. J., and Kudriavtsev, V. V., 1993, “A Numerical Simulation of a Brush Seal Section and Some Experimental Results,” ASME paper no. 93-GT-398.
15.
Kudriavtsev, V. V., and Braun, M. J., 1993, “A Reynolds Number Parametric Numerical Investigation of Flow Structures and Pressure Distribution in a System of Cylinder Arrays,” Proc. of ASME Int. Fluid Eng. Conf. FED-Vol. 149, Washington D.C., pp. 83–93.
16.
Braun, M. J., and Kudriavtsev, V. V., 1993, “Numerical Visualization of Flow Structures in Dense Banks of Cylinders Located in a Channel,” Proc. of ASME Int. Fluid Eng. Conf. FED-Vol. 172, Washington D.C., pp. 253–260
17.
Sharatchandra
,
M. C.
, and
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
1996
, “
Computed Effects of Rotor-Induced Swirl on Brush Seal Performance—Part 1: Leakage Analysis
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
912
919
.
18.
Demiroglu, M., Aksit, M. F., and Tichy, J. A., 1998, “A Numerical Study of Brush Seal Leakage Flow,” AIAA paper no. 98-3173.
19.
Braun, M. J., Hendricks, R. C., and Canacci, V. A., 1990, “Non-Intrusive Qualitative and Quantitative Flow Characterization and Bulk Flow Model for Brush Seals,” Proceedings of the Japan International Tribology Conference, Nagoya, pp. 1611–1616.
20.
Hendricks, R. C., Braun, M. J., Canacci, V., and Mullen, R. L., 1990, “Brush Seals in Vehicle Tribology,” presented at 1990 Leeds/Lyon Symposium, Leeds, England, pp. 231–242.
21.
Hendricks, R. C., Schlumberger, S., Braun, M. J., Choy, F., and Mullen, R. L., 1991, “A Bulk Flow Model of a Brush Seal System,” ASME paper no. 91-GT-325.
22.
Hendricks, R., Proctor, M., Schlumberger, J., Braun, M., and Mullen, R., 1991, “Some Preliminary Results of Brush Seal/Rotor Interference Effects on Leakage at Zero and Low RPM Using a Tapered-Plug Rotor,” AIAA paper no. 91-3390.
23.
Gunter
,
A. Y.
, and
Shaw
,
W. A.
,
1945
, “
A General Correlation of Friction Factors for Various Types of Surfaces in Crossflow
,”
Trans. ASME
,
67
, pp.
643
660
.
24.
Chupp, R. E., Holle, G. F., and Dowler, C. A., 1991, “Simple Leakage Flow Model for Brush Seals,” AIAA paper no. 91-1913.
25.
Knudsen, J. G., and Katz, D. L., 1958, Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, Chap. 11.
26.
Holle, G. F., Chupp, R. E., and Dowler, C. A., 1992, “Brush Seal Leakage Correlations Based on Effective Thickness,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery (ISROMAC-4) Honolulu, HI, pp. 253–261.
27.
Dowler, C. A., Chupp, R. E., and Holle, G. F., 1992, “Simple Effective Thickness Model for Circular Brush Seals,” AIAA paper no. 92-3192.
28.
Chupp
,
R. E.
, and
Holle
,
G. F.
,
1996
, “
Generalizing Circular Brush Seal Leakage Through a Randomly Distributed Bristle Bed
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
153
161
.
29.
Modi, M., 1992, “Modelling Bristle Lift-Off in Idealized Brush Seal Configurations,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery (ISROMAC-4), Honolulu, HI, pp. 623–632.
30.
Bayley
,
F. J.
, and
Long
,
C. A.
,
1993
, “
A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study of Flow and Pressure Distributions in a Brush Seal
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
115
, No.
2
, pp.
404
410
.
31.
Hendricks, R. C., Flower, R., and Howe, H., 1996, “A Brush Seal Program Modeling and Developments,” NASA Technical Memorandum 107158.
32.
Ergun
,
S.
,
1952
, “
Fluid Flow Through Packed Columns
,”
Chem. Eng. Prog.
,
19
, pp.
89
94
.
33.
Chew
,
J. W.
, and
Hogg
,
S. I.
,
1997
, “
Porosity Modeling of Brush Seals
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
119
, pp.
769
775
.
34.
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Lapworth
,
B. L.
, and
Millener
,
P. J.
,
1995
, “
Mathematical Modeling of Brush Seals
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
16
, No.
6
, pp.
494
500
.
35.
Turner, M. T., Chew, J. W., and Long, C. A., 1997, “Experimental Investigation and Mathematical Modeling of Clearance Brush Seals,” ASME paper no. 97-GT-282.
36.
Chen, L. H., Wood, P. E., Jones, T. V., and Chew, J. W., 1998, “An Iterative CFD and Mechanical Brush Seal Model and Comparison With Experimental Results,” ASME paper no. 98-GT-372.
37.
Chen
,
L. H.
,
Wood
,
P. E.
,
Jones
,
T. V.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
2000
, “
Detailed Experimental Studies of Flow in Large Scale Brush Seal Model and a Comparison With CFD Predictions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
122
, pp.
672
679
.
You do not currently have access to this content.