The focus of the study described herein is the characterization of the high-pressure hydraulic electronic unit injector (HEUI) and of the electronic unit injector (EUI) diesel injection systems. The characterization items include injection pressure, injection rate, injector response time, needle lift, start up injection transient, and dynamic discharge coefficient of the nozzles. Macroscopic and microscopic spray visualizations were also performed. The effects of injection conditions and nozzle configurations on injection characteristics were reviewed. Nozzle sac pressure was measured to correlate with the up-stream injection pressure. A LabVIEW data acquisition and controls system was implemented to operate the injection systems and to acquire and analyze data. For an HEUI system, based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that common-rail pressure and length of the injection rate-shaping pipe determine the injection pressure, while the pressure rising rate and injection duration determine the peak injection pressure; it was also found that the nozzle flow area, common-rail pressure, and the length of the rate-shaping pipe are the dominating parameters that control the injection rate, and the rate shape is affected mainly by common-rail pressure, especially the pressure rising rate and length of the rate-shaping pipe. Both injection pressure and ambient pressure affected the spray tip penetration significantly. The penetration increased corresponding to the increase of injection pressure or decrease of ambient pressure. The variation of spray penetration depends on the type of injection system, nozzle configuration, and ambient pressure. The large penetration variation observed on the HEUI sprays could be caused by eccentricity of the VCO (valve-covered-orifices) nozzle. The variation of the mini-sac nozzle was 50% less than that of the VCO nozzle. The near-field spray behavior was shown to be highly transient and strongly depended on injector design, nozzle configuration, needle lift and oscillation, and injection pressure.

1.
Han
J. S
,
Wang
,
T. C.
Xie
,
X. B.
,
Lai
,
M.-C.
, and
Henein
,
N. A.
,
2000
, “
Dynamics of Multiple-Injection Fuel Sprays in a Small-Bore HSDI Diesel Engine
,”
SAE Trans.
,
109
(
3
), pp.
1538
1554
.
2.
Han, J. S., Wang, T. C., and Lai, M.-C., 1999, “Common-Rail Diesel Fuel Injection System Dynamics and Spray Characterization,” ILASS AMERICAS ‘99, Indianapolis, IN, pp. 201–205.
3.
Harrington, D., and Lai, M.-C., 1998, “Characterization and Visualization of Hole-To-Hole Variation and Wall Impingement of Diesel Sprays,” ILASS AMERICAS ‘98, Indianapolis, IN, pp. 106–110.
4.
Pierpont, D. A., and Reitz, R. D., 1995, ”Effects of Injection Pressure and Nozzle Geometry on D.I. Diesel Emissions and Performance,” SAE Paper No. 950604.
5.
Kato, T., Tsujimura, K., Shintani, M., Minami, T., and Yamaguchi, I., 1989, ”Spray Characteristics and Combustion Improvement of D.I. Diesel Engine With High Pressure Fuel Injection,” SAE Paper No. 890265.
6.
Stockner A. R., Flinn M. A., and Camplin, F. A., 1993, ”Development of the HEUI Fuel System — Integration of Design, Simulation, Test, and Manufacturing,” SAE Paper No. 930271.
7.
Wang, T. C., Han, J. S., Xie, X. B., Lai, M. C., and Henein, N. A., 1999, “Direct Visualization of High Pressure Diesel Spray and Engine Combustion,” SAE Paper No. 1999-01-3496.
8.
Bosch, W., 1966, “The Fuel Rate Indicator; A New Measuring Instrument for Display of the Characteristics of Individual Injection,” SAE Paper No. 660749.
9.
Sjoberg
,
H.
,
Manneberg
,
G.
, and
Cronhjort
,
A.
,
1996
, “
Long-Working-Distance Microscope Used for Diesel Injection Spray Imaging
,”
Opt. Eng. (Bellingham)
35
(
12
), pp.
3591
3596
.
10.
Fath A., Munch K. U., and Leipertz, A., 1997, “Spray Break-up Process of Diesel Fuel Investigated Close to the Nozzle,” Proceedings of ICLASS - ’97, Seoul, Korea, Aug., pp. 513–520.
11.
Lai
,
M.-C.
,
Wang
,
T.-C.
,
Xie
,
X.
,
Han
,
J.
,
Henein
,
N. A.
,
Schwarz
,
E.
, and
Bryzik
,
W.
,
1998
, “
Microscopic Characterization of Diesel Sprays at VCO Nozzle Exit
,”
SAE Trans.
,
107
(
4
), pp.
1283
1293
.
12.
Hiroyasu
,
H.
,
Kadota
,
T.
, and
Arai
,
M.
,
1983
, “
Development and Use of a Spray Combustion Modeling to Predict Diesel Engine Efficiency and Pollutant Emission
,”
Bull. JSME
26
(
214
), pp.
Apr
Apr
.
13.
Kuo, T. W., 1987, “Evaluation of a Phenomenological Spray-Combustion Model for Two Open-Chamber Diesel Engines,” SAE Paper No. 872057.
14.
Soteriou, C., Andrews, R., and Smith, M., 1995, “Direct Injection Diesel Sprays and the Effect of Cavitation and hydraulic Flip on Atomization,” SAE Paper No. 950080.
15.
Dan, T., Lai, M.-C., Wang, T.-C., and Xie, X., 1998, “Transient Characterization of High-Pressure Diesel Sprays,” COMODIA 98, JSME Engine Division, pp. 471–477.
16.
Lai, M.-C., Dan, T., Wang, T.-C., and Xie, X., 1998, “Correlating the Diesel Spray Behavior to Nozzle Design,” SAE Paper No. 982681.
You do not currently have access to this content.