Condition monitoring of engine gas generators plays an essential role in airline fleet management. Adaptive diagnostic systems are becoming available that interpret measured data, furnish diagnosis of problems, provide a prognosis of engine health for planning purposes, and rank engines for scheduled maintenance. More than four hundred operations worldwide currently use versions of the first or second generation diagnostic tools. Development of a third generation system is underway which will provide additional system enhancements and combine the functions of the existing tools. Proposed enhancements include the use of artificial intelligence to automate, improve the quality of the analysis, provide timely alerts, and the use of an Internet link for collaboration. One objective of these enhancements is to have the intelligent system do more of the analysis and decision making, while continuing to support the depth of analysis currently available at experienced operations. This paper presents recent developments in technology and strategies in engine condition monitoring including: (1) application of statistical analysis and artificial neural network filters to improve data quality, (2) neural networks for trend change detection, and classification to diagnose performance change, and (3) expert systems to diagnose, provide alerts and to rank maintenance action recommendations.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Controls and Diagnostics
Topics:
Artificial neural networks, Expert systems, Gas turbines, Engines, Condition monitoring, Maintenance, Artificial intelligence, Collaboration, Decision making, Filters, Generators, Internet, Statistical analysis
1.
Vachtsevanos, G., 1995, “Neuro-Fuzzy Tools For Modeling, Optimization, and Control of Complex Systems,” Georgia Institute of Technology, Intelligent Control Laboratory, Atlanta, GA.
2.
Volponi, A., 1994, “Sensor Error Compensation In Engine Performance Diagnostics,” ASME Paper 94-GT-58.
3.
Jaw, L., 1997, “Neural Network Modeling of Engine Tip Clearance,” presented at the 33rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Session 24-ASME-7 Smart Engine Technology.
4.
Urban, L., and Volponi, A., 1992, “Mathematical Methods of Relative Engine Performance Diagnostics,” SAE Technical Paper 922048.
5.
Miller
B.
,
1997
, “
AMOSS May Stem Rising Maintenance Costs
,”
Overhaul & Maintenance
, September-October, Vol.
3
, No.
5
, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, pp.
51
–
56
.
6.
Rumbaugh, J., 1991, “Object-Oriented Modeling and Design,” Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7.
Fikes, R., and Keller, T., 1985, “The Role of Frame-Based Representation in Reasoning,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 28, No. 9, Sept.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1999
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.