This study experimentally investigates the drag reduction characteristics of the most commonly used polymer fluids in coiled tubing applications. The flow loop employed consists of 12.7mm straight and coiled tubing sections. The curvature ratio (aR, where a and R are the radii of the tubing and the reel drum, respectively) investigated is from 0.01 to 0.076, which covers the typical curvature ratio range encountered in the oil and gas industry applications. Fluids tested include xanthan gum, guar gum, and hydroxypropyl guar at various polymer concentrations. It is found that the drag reduction in coiled tubing is significantly lower than that in straight tubing, probably due to the effect of secondary flow in curved geometry. The onset of drag reduction is also found to be delayed as the curvature ratio was increased. A correlation for the maximum drag reduction (MDR) asymptote in coiled tubing is developed. When the curvature ratio is set to zero, the new correlation reduces to the well-known Virk’s MDR asymptote for dilute polymer solutions in straight pipes. A new drag reduction envelope is proposed for the analysis of drag reduction behavior of polymeric fluids in coiled tubing. Application of the new drag reduction envelope is also discussed.

1.
Toms
,
B. A.
, 1948, “
Some Observations on the Flow of Linear Polymer Solutions Through Straight Tubes at Large Reynolds Numbers
,”
Proceedings of the First International Congress on Rheology
,
North Holland
,
Amsterdams
vol.
2
, pp.
135
141
.
2.
Lumley
,
J. L.
, 1969, “
Drag Reduction by Additives
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
0066-4189,
1
, pp.
367
384
.
3.
Hoyt
,
J. W.
, 1972, “
The Effect of Additives on Fluid Friction
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
0021-9223,
94
(
2
), pp.
258
285
.
4.
Hoyt
,
J. W.
, 1990, “
Drag Reduction by Polymers and Surfactants
,”
Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers
,
D. M.
Bushnell
and
J. N.
Hefner
eds.,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
,
Washington, DC
.
5.
Virk
,
P. S.
, 1975, “
Drag Reduction Fundamentals
,”
AIChE J.
0001-1541,
21
(
4
), pp.
625
656
.
6.
Berman
,
N. S.
, 1978, “
Drag Reduction by Polymers
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
0066-4189,
10
, pp.
47
64
.
7.
Kostic
,
M.
, 1994, “
On Turbulent Drag and Heat Transfer Reduction Phenomena and Laminar Heat Transfer Enhancement in Non-Circular Duct Flow of Certain Non-Newtonian Fluids
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
0017-9310,
37
(
1
), pp.
133
147
.
8.
Housiadas
,
K. D.
, and
Beris
,
A. N.
, 2003, “
Polymer-Induced Drag Reduction: Effects of the Variations in Elasticity and Inertia in Turbulent Viscoelastic Channel Flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
1070-6631,
15
(
8
), pp.
2369
2384
.
9.
Housiadas
,
K. D.
, and
Beris
,
A. N.
, 2004, “
Characteristic Scales and Drag Reduction Evaluation in Turbulent Channel Flow of Nonconstant Viscosity Viscoelastic Fluids
,”
Phys. Fluids
1070-6631,
16
(
5
), pp.
1581
1586
.
10.
Terrapon
,
V. E.
,
Dubief
,
Y.
,
Moin
,
P.
,
Shaqfeh
,
E. S. G.
, and
Lele
,
S. K.
, 2004, “
Simulated Polymer Stretch in a Turbulent Flow Using Bronian Dynamics
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
504
, pp.
61
71
.
11.
Dubief
,
Y.
,
Terrapon
,
V. E.
,
White
,
C. M.
,
Shaqfeh
,
E. S. G.
,
Moin
,
P.
, and
Lele
,
S. K.
, 2005, “
New Answers on the Ineraction between Polymers and Vortices in Turbulent Flows
,”
Flow, Turbul. Combust.
1386-6184,
74
, pp.
311
329
.
12.
Dubief
,
Y.
,
White
,
C. M.
,
Terrapon
,
V. E.
,
Shaqfeh
,
E. S. G.
,
Moin
,
P.
, and
Lele
,
S. K.
, 2004, “
On the Coherent Drag-Reducing and Turbulence-Enhancing Behavior of Polymers in Wall Flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
514
, pp.
271
280
.
13.
Dimitropoulos
,
C. D.
,
Dubief
,
Y.
,
Shaqfeh
,
E. S. G.
, and
Moin
,
P.
, 2006, “
Direct Numerical Simulation of Polymer-Induced Drag Reduction in Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow of Inhomogeneous Polymer Solutions
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
566
, pp.
153
162
.
14.
Kelkar
,
J. V.
, and
Mashelkar
,
R. A.
, 1972, “
Drag Reduction in Dilute Polymer Solutions
,”
J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
0021-8995,
16
, pp.
3047
3046
.
15.
Yokoyama
,
T.
, and
Tomita
,
Y.
, 1986, “
Flow of Dilute Polymer Solutions Through Curved Bends
,”
Bull. JSME
0021-3764,
29
(
252
), pp.
1740
1745
.
16.
Shah
,
S. N.
, and
Zhou
,
Y.
, 2003, “
An Experimental Study of Drag Reduction of Polymer Solutions in Coiled Tubing
,”
SPEPF
1064-668X,
18
(
4
), pp.
280
287
.
17.
Savins
,
J. G.
, 1964, “
Drag Reduction Characteristics of Solutions of Macromolecules in Turbulent Pipe Flow
,”
SPEJ
0037-9999,
4
(
3
), pp.
203
214
.
18.
Srinivasan
,
P. S.
,
Nandapurkar
,
S. S.
, and
Holland
,
F. A.
, 1970, “
Friction Factors for Coils
,”
Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng.
0371-7496,
48
, pp.
T156
-
T161
.
19.
Zhou
,
Y.
, 2006, “
Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Power-Law Fluid Flow in Coiled Tubing
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
20.
Virk
,
P. S.
,
Mickley
,
H. S.
, and
Smith
,
K. A.
, 1970, “
The Ultimate Asymptote and Mean Flow Structure in Toms Phenomenon
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
37
, pp.
488
493
.
21.
Liu
,
S.
, and
Masliyah
,
J. H.
, 1993, “
Axially Invariant Laminar Flow in Helical Pipes With a Finite Pitch
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
251
, pp.
315
353
.
22.
Zhou
,
Y.
, and
Shah
,
S. N.
, 2004, “
Fluid Flow in Coiled Tubing: A Literature Review and Experimental Investigation
,”
J. Cdn. Pet. Tech.
0021-9487,
43
(
6
), pp.
52
61
.
You do not currently have access to this content.