Background. Identifying the locations and amounts of unproduced gas in mature reservoirs is often a challenging problem, due to several factors. Complete integrated reservoir studies to determine drilling locations and potential of new wells are often too time-consuming and costly for many fields. In this work, we evaluate the accuracy of a statistical moving-window method (MWM) that has been used in low-permeability (“tight”) gas formations to assess infill and recompletion potential. The primary advantages of the technique are its speed and its limited need for data, using only well location and production data. Method of Approach. To test the method, we created a number of hypothetical reservoirs and calculated infill well potential using a reservoir simulator. We used the MWM to analyze these data sets, then compared results to those from the reservoir simulations. Results. The results validate empirical observations made using MWM during field evaluations. Depending on the level of reservoir heterogeneity, the MWM infill predictions for individual wells can be off by more than ±50%. The MWM more accurately predicts the production potential from a group of infill candidates, the MWM, however, more often to within 10%. We describe a procedure to estimate the number of wells needed to predict production potential to within a stipulated accuracy. The ability of MWM to accurately predict production performance for groups of wells shows that it can be a useful tool for scoping studies or identifying areas for more detailed evaluation.

1.
Hohn, M. E., 1999, “Geostatistics and Petroleum Geology,” Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 98–101.
2.
McCain, W. D., Jr., Voneiff, G. W., Hunt, E. R., and Semmelbeck, M. E., 1993, “A Tight Gas Field Study: Carthage (Cotton Valley) Field,” paper SPE 26141 presented at the SPE Gas Tech. Symp., Calgary, 28–30 June.
3.
Voneiff, G. W., and Cipolla, C., 1996, “A New Approach to Large-Scale Infill Evaluations Applied to the Ozona (Canyon) Gas Field,” paper SPE 35203 presented at the SPE Permian Oil and Gas Recovery Conf., Midland, Texas, 27–29 Mar.
4.
Hudson, J. W., Jochen, J. E., and Jochen, V. A., 2000, “Practical Technique to Identify Infill Potential in Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs Applied to the Milk River Formation in Canada,” paper SPE 59779 presented at the SPE/CERI Gas Tech. Symp., Calgary, 3–5 April.
5.
Hudson, J. W., Jochen, J. E., and Spivey, J. P., 2001, “Practical Methods to High-Grade Infill Opportunities Applied to the Mesaverde, Morrow, and Cotton Valley Formations,” paper SPE 68598 presented at the SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symp., Dallas, 2–3 April.
6.
Guan, L., 2003, “Evaluation of a Statistical Infill Candidate Selection Technique,” MS thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
7.
Jensen, J. L., Lake, L. W., Corbett, P. W. M., and Goggin, D. J., 2003, Statistics for Petroleum Engineers and Geoscientists, 2nd ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 66 and 115.
You do not currently have access to this content.