Quantitative computed tomography (qCT) relies on calibrated bone mineral density data. If a calibration phantom is absent from the CT scan, post hoc calibration becomes necessary. Scanning a calibration phantom after-the-fact and applying that calibration to uncalibrated scans has been used previously. Alternatively, the estimated density is known to vary with CT settings, suggesting that it may be possible to predict the calibration terms using CT settings. This study compares a novel CT setting regression method for post hoc calibration to standard and post hoc phantom-only calibrations. Five cadaveric upper limbs were scanned at 11 combinations of peak tube voltage and current (80–140 kV and 100–300 mA) with two calibration phantoms. Density calibrations were performed for the cadaver scans, and scans of the phantoms alone. Stepwise linear regression determined if the calibration equation terms were predictable using peak tube voltage and current. Peak tube voltage, but not current, was significantly correlated with regression calibration terms. Calibration equation slope was significantly related to the type of phantom (p < 0.001), calibration method (p = 0.026), and peak tube voltage (p < 0.001), but not current (p = 1.000). The calibration equation vertical intercept was significantly related to the type of phantom (p < 0.001), and peak tube voltage (p = 0.006), but not calibration method (p = 0.682), or current (p = 0.822). Accordingly, regression can correlate peak tube voltage with density calibration terms. Suggesting that, while standard qCT calibration is preferable, regression calibration may be an acceptable post hoc method when necessary.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2018
Technical Briefs
Methods for Post Hoc Quantitative Computed Tomography Bone Density Calibration: Phantom-Only and Regression
Jacob M. Reeves,
Jacob M. Reeves
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: jreeves3@uwo.ca
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: jreeves3@uwo.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
Nikolas K. Knowles,
Nikolas K. Knowles
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: nknowle@uwo.ca
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: nknowle@uwo.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
George S. Athwal,
George S. Athwal
Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre,
268 Grosvenor Street,
London, ON N6A4V2, Canada
e-mail: gathwal@uwo.ca
268 Grosvenor Street,
London, ON N6A4V2, Canada
e-mail: gathwal@uwo.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
James A. Johnson
James A. Johnson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: jajohnso@uwo.ca
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: jajohnso@uwo.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
Jacob M. Reeves
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: jreeves3@uwo.ca
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: jreeves3@uwo.ca
Nikolas K. Knowles
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: nknowle@uwo.ca
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: nknowle@uwo.ca
George S. Athwal
Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre,
268 Grosvenor Street,
London, ON N6A4V2, Canada
e-mail: gathwal@uwo.ca
268 Grosvenor Street,
London, ON N6A4V2, Canada
e-mail: gathwal@uwo.ca
James A. Johnson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: jajohnso@uwo.ca
Western University Canada,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A3K7, Canada
e-mail: jajohnso@uwo.ca
Manuscript received July 20, 2017; final manuscript received April 21, 2018; published online May 24, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Joel D. Stitzel.
J Biomech Eng. Sep 2018, 140(9): 094501 (6 pages)
Published Online: May 24, 2018
Article history
Received:
July 20, 2017
Revised:
April 21, 2018
Citation
Reeves, J. M., Knowles, N. K., Athwal, G. S., and Johnson, J. A. (May 24, 2018). "Methods for Post Hoc Quantitative Computed Tomography Bone Density Calibration: Phantom-Only and Regression." ASME. J Biomech Eng. September 2018; 140(9): 094501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040122
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
The Effect of Quantitative Computed Tomography Acquisition Protocols on Bone Mineral Density Estimation
J Biomech Eng (November,2015)
The Effects of Helmet Weight on Hybrid III Head and Neck Responses by Comparing Unhelmeted and Helmeted Impacts
J Biomech Eng (October,2016)
2016 Editors' Choice Papers
J Biomech Eng (February,2017)
Development of a Model Based Method for Investigating Facet Articulation
J Biomech Eng (June,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Novel and Efficient Mathematical and Computational Methods for the Analysis and Architecting of Ultralight Cellular Materials and their Macrostructural Responses
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 2
Experimental results
Ultrasonic Methods for Measurement of Small Motion and Deformation of Biological Tissues for Assessment of Viscoelasticity
Measurement Principles Applied to Skid Testing
Skid Resistance of Highway Pavements