Osteoporosis is characterized by bony material loss and decreased bone strength leading to a significant increase in fracture risk. Patient-specific quantitative computed tomography (QCT) finite element (FE) models may be used to predict fracture under physiological loading. Material properties for the FE models used to predict fracture are obtained by converting grayscale values from the CT into volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) using calibration phantoms. If there are any variations arising from the CT acquisition protocol, vBMD estimation and material property assignment could be affected, thus, affecting fracture risk prediction. We hypothesized that material property assignments may be dependent on scanning and postprocessing settings including voltage, current, and reconstruction kernel, thus potentially having an effect in fracture risk prediction. A rabbit femur and a standard calibration phantom were imaged by QCT using different protocols. Cortical and cancellous regions were segmented, their average Hounsfield unit (HU) values obtained and converted to vBMD. Estimated vBMD for the cortical and cancellous regions were affected by voltage and kernel but not by current. Our study demonstrated that there exists a significant variation in the estimated vBMD values obtained with different scanning acquisitions. In addition, the large noise differences observed utilizing different scanning parameters could have an important negative effect on small subregions containing fewer voxels.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2015
Technical Briefs
The Effect of Quantitative Computed Tomography Acquisition Protocols on Bone Mineral Density Estimation
Hugo Giambini,
Hugo Giambini
Biomechanics Laboratory,
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: giambini.hugo@mayo.edu
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: giambini.hugo@mayo.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Dan Dragomir-Daescu,
Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Division of Engineering,
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: dragomirdaescu.dan@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: dragomirdaescu.dan@mayo.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul M. Huddleston,
Paul M. Huddleston
Biomechanics Laboratory,
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: huddleston.paul@mayo.edu
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: huddleston.paul@mayo.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Jon J. Camp,
Jon J. Camp
Biomedical Imaging Resource,
Department of Radiology,
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: camp.jon@mayo.edu
Department of Radiology,
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: camp.jon@mayo.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Kai-Nan An,
Kai-Nan An
Biomechanics Laboratory,
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: an.kainan@mayo.edu
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: an.kainan@mayo.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Ahmad Nassr
Ahmad Nassr
Biomechanics Laboratory,
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: nassr.ahmad@mayo.edu
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: nassr.ahmad@mayo.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Hugo Giambini
Biomechanics Laboratory,
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: giambini.hugo@mayo.edu
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: giambini.hugo@mayo.edu
Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Division of Engineering,
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: dragomirdaescu.dan@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: dragomirdaescu.dan@mayo.edu
Paul M. Huddleston
Biomechanics Laboratory,
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: huddleston.paul@mayo.edu
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: huddleston.paul@mayo.edu
Jon J. Camp
Biomedical Imaging Resource,
Department of Radiology,
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: camp.jon@mayo.edu
Department of Radiology,
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: camp.jon@mayo.edu
Kai-Nan An
Biomechanics Laboratory,
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: an.kainan@mayo.edu
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: an.kainan@mayo.edu
Ahmad Nassr
Biomechanics Laboratory,
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: nassr.ahmad@mayo.edu
Division of Orthopedic Research,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: nassr.ahmad@mayo.edu
Manuscript received April 8, 2015; final manuscript received September 8, 2015; published online September 30, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Joel D. Stitzel.
J Biomech Eng. Nov 2015, 137(11): 114502 (6 pages)
Published Online: September 30, 2015
Article history
Received:
April 8, 2015
Revised:
September 8, 2015
Accepted:
September 9, 2015
Citation
Giambini, H., Dragomir-Daescu, D., Huddleston, P. M., Camp, J. J., An, K., and Nassr, A. (September 30, 2015). "The Effect of Quantitative Computed Tomography Acquisition Protocols on Bone Mineral Density Estimation." ASME. J Biomech Eng. November 2015; 137(11): 114502. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031572
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
A Numerical Study of Crack Penetration and Deflection at the Interface Between Peritubular and Intertubular Dentin
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Related Articles
Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness
J Biomech Eng (September,2016)
Osteoporotic Hip Fracture Prediction: Is T-Score-Based Criterion Enough? A Hip Structural Analysis-Based Model
J Biomech Eng (November,2018)
Methods for Post Hoc Quantitative Computed Tomography Bone Density Calibration: Phantom-Only and Regression
J Biomech Eng (September,2018)
Development of a Model Based Method for Investigating Facet Articulation
J Biomech Eng (June,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Novel and Efficient Mathematical and Computational Methods for the Analysis and Architecting of Ultralight Cellular Materials and their Macrostructural Responses
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 2
Estimating Resilient Modulus Using Neural Network Models
Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 17
Experimental results
Ultrasonic Methods for Measurement of Small Motion and Deformation of Biological Tissues for Assessment of Viscoelasticity