The hemodynamic and the thrombogenic performance of two commercially available bileaflet mechanical heart valves (MHVs)—the ATS Open Pivot Valve (ATS) and the St. Jude Regent Valve (SJM), was compared using a state of the art computational fluid dynamics-fluid structure interaction (CFD-FSI) methodology. A transient simulation of the ATS and SJM valves was conducted in a three-dimensional model geometry of a straight conduit with sudden expansion distal the valves, including the valve housing and detailed hinge geometry. An aortic flow waveform (60 beats/min, cardiac output 4 l∕min) was applied at the inlet. The FSI formulation utilized a fully implicit coupling procedure using a separate solver for the fluid problem (FLUENT) and for the structural problem. Valve leaflet excursion and pressure differences were calculated, as well as shear stress on the leaflets and accumulated shear stress on particles released during both forward and backward flow phases through the open and closed valve, respectively. In contrast to the SJM, the ATS valve opened to less than maximal opening angle. Nevertheless, maximal and mean pressure gradients and velocity patterns through the valve orifices were comparable. Platelet stress accumulation during forward flow indicated that no platelets experienced a stress accumulation higher than 35 dynes/cm2, the threshold for platelet activation (Hellums criterion). However, during the regurgitation flow phase, 0.81% of the platelets in the SJM valve experienced a stress accumulation higher than 35 dynes/cm2, compared with 0.63% for the ATS valve. The numerical results indicate that the designs of the ATS and SJM valves, which differ mostly in their hinge mechanism, lead to different potential for platelet activation, especially during the regurgitation phase. This numerical methodology can be used to assess the effects of design parameters on the flow induced thrombogenic potential of blood recirculating devices.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: danny.bluestein@sunysb.edu
Article navigation
August 2007
Technical Papers
Comparison of the Hemodynamic and Thrombogenic Performance of Two Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valves Using a CFD/FSI Model
Kris Dumont,
Kris Dumont
Cardiovascular Mechanics and Biofluid Dynamics Research Unit, IBiTech,
Ghent University
, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University
, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181
Search for other works by this author on:
Jan Vierendeels,
Jan Vierendeels
Department of Flow, Heat, and Combustion Mechanics,
Ghent University
, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
Rado Kaminsky,
Rado Kaminsky
Cardiovascular Mechanics and Biofluid Dynamics Research Unit, IBiTech,
Ghent University
, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
Guido van Nooten,
Guido van Nooten
Department of Surgery,
University Hospital Ghent
, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
Pascal Verdonck,
Pascal Verdonck
Cardiovascular Mechanics and Biofluid Dynamics Research Unit, IBiTech,
Ghent University
, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
Danny Bluestein
Danny Bluestein
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
e-mail: danny.bluestein@sunysb.edu
Stony Brook University
, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181
Search for other works by this author on:
Kris Dumont
Cardiovascular Mechanics and Biofluid Dynamics Research Unit, IBiTech,
Ghent University
, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University
, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181
Jan Vierendeels
Department of Flow, Heat, and Combustion Mechanics,
Ghent University
, Belgium
Rado Kaminsky
Cardiovascular Mechanics and Biofluid Dynamics Research Unit, IBiTech,
Ghent University
, Belgium
Guido van Nooten
Department of Surgery,
University Hospital Ghent
, Belgium
Pascal Verdonck
Cardiovascular Mechanics and Biofluid Dynamics Research Unit, IBiTech,
Ghent University
, Belgium
Danny Bluestein
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Stony Brook University
, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181e-mail: danny.bluestein@sunysb.edu
J Biomech Eng. Aug 2007, 129(4): 558-565 (8 pages)
Published Online: January 22, 2007
Article history
Received:
September 6, 2006
Revised:
January 22, 2007
Citation
Dumont, K., Vierendeels, J., Kaminsky, R., van Nooten, G., Verdonck, P., and Bluestein, D. (January 22, 2007). "Comparison of the Hemodynamic and Thrombogenic Performance of Two Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valves Using a CFD/FSI Model." ASME. J Biomech Eng. August 2007; 129(4): 558–565. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2746378
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
We Will, We Will Shock You: Adaptive Versus Conventional Functional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals Post-Stroke
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Evaluation of an Inverse Method for Quantifying Spatially Variable Mechanics
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Effect of Structure and Wearing Modes on the Protective Performance of Industrial Safety Helmet
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Sex-Based Differences and Asymmetry in Hip Kinematics During Unilateral Extension From Deep Hip Flexion
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Related Articles
Numerical Study of Shear-Induced Thrombus Formation Over Aterial Stent Struts
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
The Effect of Implantation Orientation of a Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve on Kinematics and Hemodynamics in an Anatomic Aorta
J Biomech Eng (November,2010)
Hydrodynamic Effects of Compliance Mismatch in Stented Arteries
J Biomech Eng (February,2011)
Endothelial Responses to Curvature-Induced Flow Patterns in Engineered Cerebral Aneurysms
J Biomech Eng (January,2023)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Concluding remarks
Mechanical Blood Trauma in Circulatory-Assist Devices
Introduction
Mechanical Blood Trauma in Circulatory-Assist Devices
Analysis of Components in VIII-2
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels, Third Edition