Rigid body total knee replacement (TKR) models with tibiofemoral contact based on elastic foundation (EF) theory utilize simple contact pressure-surface overclosure relationships to estimate joint mechanics, and require significantly less computational time than corresponding deformable finite element (FE) methods. However, potential differences in predicted kinematics between these representations are currently not well understood, and it is unclear if the estimates of contact area and pressure are acceptable. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to develop rigid EF and deformable FE models of tibiofemoral contact, and to compare predicted kinematics and contact mechanics from both representations during gait loading conditions with three different implant designs. Linear and nonlinear contact pressure-surface overclosure relationships based on polyethylene material properties were developed using EF theory. All other variables being equal, rigid body FE models accurately estimated kinematics predicted by fully deformable FE models and required only 2% of the analysis time. As expected, the linear EF contact model sufficiently approximated trends for peak contact pressures, but overestimated the deformable results by up to 30%. The nonlinear EF contact model more accurately reproduced trends and magnitudes of the deformable analysis, with maximum differences of approximately 15% at the peak pressures during the gait cycle. All contact area predictions agreed in trend and magnitude. Using rigid models, edge-loading conditions resulted in substantial overestimation of peak pressure. Optimal nonlinear EF contact relationships were developed for specific TKR designs for use in parametric or repetitive analyses where computational time is paramount. The explicit FE analysis method utilized here provides a unique approach in that both rigid and deformable analyses can be run from the same input file, thus enabling simple selection of the most appropriate representation for the analysis of interest.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2005
Technical Papers
Comparison of Deformable and Elastic Foundation Finite Element Simulations for Predicting Knee Replacement Mechanics
Jason P. Halloran,
Jason P. Halloran
University of Denver
, Department of Engineering, 2390 S. York, Denver, CO 80208
Search for other works by this author on:
Sarah K. Easley,
Sarah K. Easley
University of Denver
, Department of Engineering, 2390 S. York, Denver, CO 80208
Search for other works by this author on:
Anthony J. Petrella,
Anthony J. Petrella
DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson Company
, Biomechanical Testing and Analysis, 700 Orthopaedic Drive, Warsaw, IN 46581
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul J. Rullkoetter
Paul J. Rullkoetter
University of Denver
, Department of Engineering, 2390 S. York, Denver, CO 80208
Search for other works by this author on:
Jason P. Halloran
University of Denver
, Department of Engineering, 2390 S. York, Denver, CO 80208
Sarah K. Easley
University of Denver
, Department of Engineering, 2390 S. York, Denver, CO 80208
Anthony J. Petrella
DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson Company
, Biomechanical Testing and Analysis, 700 Orthopaedic Drive, Warsaw, IN 46581
Paul J. Rullkoetter
University of Denver
, Department of Engineering, 2390 S. York, Denver, CO 80208J Biomech Eng. Oct 2005, 127(5): 813-818 (6 pages)
Published Online: May 20, 2005
Article history
Received:
October 7, 2003
Revised:
May 20, 2005
Citation
Halloran, J. P., Easley, S. K., Petrella, A. J., and Rullkoetter, P. J. (May 20, 2005). "Comparison of Deformable and Elastic Foundation Finite Element Simulations for Predicting Knee Replacement Mechanics." ASME. J Biomech Eng. October 2005; 127(5): 813–818. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1992522
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
We Will, We Will Shock You: Adaptive Versus Conventional Functional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals Post-Stroke
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Evaluation of an Inverse Method for Quantifying Spatially Variable Mechanics
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Effect of Structure and Wearing Modes on the Protective Performance of Industrial Safety Helmet
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Sex-Based Differences and Asymmetry in Hip Kinematics During Unilateral Extension From Deep Hip Flexion
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Related Articles
Human Joint Simulation Using LifeMOD Co-Simulation
J. Med. Devices (June,2008)
Real-Time, In Vivo Measurement of Contact Pressures at a Knee Arthroplasty
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
A Design Framework of Unloaded Leaflet Shape for the Ovine Pulmonary Valve Single Leaflet Replacement Surgery
J. Med. Devices (June,2011)
Related Chapters
Understanding the Problem
Design and Application of the Worm Gear
Data Tabulations
Structural Shear Joints: Analyses, Properties and Design for Repeat Loading
On the Evaluation of Thermal and Mechanical Factors in Low-Speed Sliding
Tribology of Mechanical Systems: A Guide to Present and Future Technologies